Are Liberals Unpatriotic? Yes.
I’m often asked if I think liberals want to destroy society.
Well, yes and no.
And I’m often asked if liberals are unpatriotic. To this, I answer yes. Yes, they are, beyond a doubt.
Think of liberal lip service; it is used as a stalling tactic. Like the mens rea following the commission of a crime, liberal effects depend largely on going undetected for as long as possible. Stock fraud manipulators use the same tactic: postponing or ignoring objections, delaying answers to shareholder due diligence shareholders have a right to investigate. Stonewalling, you might call it, is common, and in the form of lip service in politics, it’s not often seen for what it is. Lip service from the left is part of larger movement to discourage resistance in this country – to stall debate – while progressive programs move forward with apparently no objection on the record.
Critical thinking is the best countermeasure of the average Joe and Josephine Taxpayer. Critical thinking means persevering and insisting on answers, and with no answers, one must necessarily presume, then, that a betrayal is operating.
Here is the evidence that clinches the case.
#1: All for Nothing. Liberals carp on issues that destroy and get nothing done. Liberals hate more truly than anyone they accuse. I’ve believed that racism would die a natural death of old age if liberals didn’t resuscitate it hourly. In the case of eminent domain handed down of late by the Supremes, much of the substance of the complaint rests with the fact that past seizures of property were based on terribly vague plans that rational people would not find clear and convincing, and in many cases when property was ultimately seized, even the clearest plans were never even begun. Thus, of course, the very basis for the filing evaporates and the property was lost for nothing. Just another example of coercion, and for what?
This is one of the best ways to sum up liberal or so-called Progressive endeavors, and their results over decades. For all the excuses, policies, arguments, it’s all for nothing.
Liberalism destroys and doesn’t build. As I’d mentioned in my last piece, liberals will never again build anything. They are the takers of society. To grow all of this for political gain is unpatriotic.
#2. Stealth Objectives. Liberals cannot trust fellow Americans. Liberal media, officials and sympathizers think so little of their fellow citizens. In their formulas of interference, intrusion and imposition – all justified by the manufacture of crises, which lead to solutions that generate more crises – liberals succeed in reaching another goal, something stealth, which blindsides the nation. (They call it unintended consequences, but let’s not be foolish: they get what they want: permanance.)
An example of this is in Education, where a centralized agency imposes more and more demands for money, but seems to accomplish less and less. Yet, there is a distinct advantage (for liberals) in making a generation of less educated kids: it justifies the claim for more money.
How does it work?
Parents see only a snapshot of time for as long as their kids are in school. Kids will be out soon and the short years kids are in any one school seems almost not worth the argument. But over decades, administrations can sneak in undesirable content, unwelcome indoctrination and more so that when we compare the educational level of the fifties to that of 2005, we see a tremendous fall in achievement. And that as the very excuse for more money. War on crime, war on poverty, you name it. They all eat money and do really nothing.
Liberals create problems in order to be the ones to call for answers. That’s unpatriotic.
#3. Liberals exempt themselves. Why? Because as they view injustices in society in need of intervention, they do not see themselves as the cause. As such – in their mind – they are not among the named accused, so they don’t believe themselves subject to the law they wrote. Instead, they see themselves as the Champions. They block out, forget or otherwise lose track of the origin of the problem, usually their interference from earlier. (I have my own theory on liberal anger and motivation.)
An example of lip service is that when they make the indictment, their use of the word "we" is prevalent. They say we are all to blame, but when it comes time to observe the rule they wrote, the word disappears and is replaced by "you". Maybe it becomes so easy to make this shift when you know darned good and well that the crisis is artificial, and not really there.
#4. Discouraging resistance. Resistance in America is a national societal value. It’s so powerful and righteous that we even resist on behalf of others. Liberals do not do this.
Let me say that again: Liberals do not resist on behalf of others. They do not give a damn about others. They use others.
Liberals interfere, obstruct, obfuscate, confiscate and lie not for the benefit of others, but on behalf of themselves; They actually believe that's what politics is all about, gain. (With a sprinkling of genuine public service.) They don;'t realize that service is others first, yourself second. The clue is the record that the so-called beneficiaries never really receive the benefit of the interference or underhandedness the liberal justified in lip service.
The Civil Rights Amendment was obstructed by the Democrats, pushed through nevertheless by the Republicans. The Republicans attempted it a hundred years earlier, too, at the inception of the Republican party, but were frustrated by the Democrats. The 1965 movement was a great idea (lip service) but when it came time to deliver, the Democrats’ bluff was called and they moved to stall it’s approval (obstruction). This tactic repeats itself throughout liberal politics, beginning from the time of Lincoln, from violent crime to education to liberty.
Which brings us to...
#5. Erasing history and silencing opposing views. Through legal filings, lies and general intimidation, unpatriotic persons are quick to deny Americans the American way of majority rule, honest debate and due process. Theirs is not just another political opinion: this is the justification of an enemy who is not working for common goal anymore but differing on method (as they announce in lip service), but an enemy working for an entirely opposite goal (as is evident in their total record).
On of the greatest clues of how liberals hate America so much is how they brazenly side with our enemies and indicate they view the situation in law enforcement terms instead of tactical terms of immediate reality. Remember that when liberals claim to work on behalf of others, there is a stealth objective underneath.
Here is the key to how we handle the unpatriotic from now on.
First, we take leftist opposition seriously not as another opinion, but for what it is: a stealth movement against America. It is time to understand and accept that liberals are not patriotic Americans merely differing with the sensible on method, but individuals with an axe to grind who make it clear by their actions that they differ on objectives. Liberals do not want what Americans want.
Second, we commit to go forward without them. Their own excess baggage and hatred of everything we stand for will never allow them to cooperate. This necessitates Americans’ becoming partisan once again, a return to unabashed patriotism. It’s not unseemly or bad etiquette to be partisan. The liberals have been having a partisan field day for forty years – after having convinced everyone else not to be partisan.
And third, we never cooperate with them again. The time for that has passed, as they have squandered our good faith and used us for our good will. We understand much more clearly now since the 2004 election that America is a majority of conservative persons with values much healthier, happier and more constructive than the inner anger and underhandedness of Democrats. We understand much better now through comparing notes nationwide and even worldwide what we have in common happily and on the kind of country we really want: one of fair play, ethics, intact and clearly defined family, and a non-interference directive in every aspect of our lives.
Are Liberals unpatriotic?
Yes, they are. When they disparage and deny others their self-reliance, when they refuse to play by the rules, when they steal archival documents, when they disrespect the concept of resistance to destructive change, resistance to real justice in America, when they move to silence opposing views, when they become underhanded and go behind our backs in legislation and in courts, including destroying protections of the Fifth Amendment, and when they are so evidently against our way of life in the very erasing of U.S. history – even though they benefit so very much from these values – then, they are most unpatriotic.
Americans would not do this to other Americans.
___________________________________________
John Longenecker is author of The Battle We Fight, available at online booksellers. His website is www.nationwideconcealedcarry.com
Well, yes and no.
And I’m often asked if liberals are unpatriotic. To this, I answer yes. Yes, they are, beyond a doubt.
Think of liberal lip service; it is used as a stalling tactic. Like the mens rea following the commission of a crime, liberal effects depend largely on going undetected for as long as possible. Stock fraud manipulators use the same tactic: postponing or ignoring objections, delaying answers to shareholder due diligence shareholders have a right to investigate. Stonewalling, you might call it, is common, and in the form of lip service in politics, it’s not often seen for what it is. Lip service from the left is part of larger movement to discourage resistance in this country – to stall debate – while progressive programs move forward with apparently no objection on the record.
Critical thinking is the best countermeasure of the average Joe and Josephine Taxpayer. Critical thinking means persevering and insisting on answers, and with no answers, one must necessarily presume, then, that a betrayal is operating.
Here is the evidence that clinches the case.
#1: All for Nothing. Liberals carp on issues that destroy and get nothing done. Liberals hate more truly than anyone they accuse. I’ve believed that racism would die a natural death of old age if liberals didn’t resuscitate it hourly. In the case of eminent domain handed down of late by the Supremes, much of the substance of the complaint rests with the fact that past seizures of property were based on terribly vague plans that rational people would not find clear and convincing, and in many cases when property was ultimately seized, even the clearest plans were never even begun. Thus, of course, the very basis for the filing evaporates and the property was lost for nothing. Just another example of coercion, and for what?
This is one of the best ways to sum up liberal or so-called Progressive endeavors, and their results over decades. For all the excuses, policies, arguments, it’s all for nothing.
Liberalism destroys and doesn’t build. As I’d mentioned in my last piece, liberals will never again build anything. They are the takers of society. To grow all of this for political gain is unpatriotic.
#2. Stealth Objectives. Liberals cannot trust fellow Americans. Liberal media, officials and sympathizers think so little of their fellow citizens. In their formulas of interference, intrusion and imposition – all justified by the manufacture of crises, which lead to solutions that generate more crises – liberals succeed in reaching another goal, something stealth, which blindsides the nation. (They call it unintended consequences, but let’s not be foolish: they get what they want: permanance.)
An example of this is in Education, where a centralized agency imposes more and more demands for money, but seems to accomplish less and less. Yet, there is a distinct advantage (for liberals) in making a generation of less educated kids: it justifies the claim for more money.
How does it work?
Parents see only a snapshot of time for as long as their kids are in school. Kids will be out soon and the short years kids are in any one school seems almost not worth the argument. But over decades, administrations can sneak in undesirable content, unwelcome indoctrination and more so that when we compare the educational level of the fifties to that of 2005, we see a tremendous fall in achievement. And that as the very excuse for more money. War on crime, war on poverty, you name it. They all eat money and do really nothing.
Liberals create problems in order to be the ones to call for answers. That’s unpatriotic.
#3. Liberals exempt themselves. Why? Because as they view injustices in society in need of intervention, they do not see themselves as the cause. As such – in their mind – they are not among the named accused, so they don’t believe themselves subject to the law they wrote. Instead, they see themselves as the Champions. They block out, forget or otherwise lose track of the origin of the problem, usually their interference from earlier. (I have my own theory on liberal anger and motivation.)
An example of lip service is that when they make the indictment, their use of the word "we" is prevalent. They say we are all to blame, but when it comes time to observe the rule they wrote, the word disappears and is replaced by "you". Maybe it becomes so easy to make this shift when you know darned good and well that the crisis is artificial, and not really there.
#4. Discouraging resistance. Resistance in America is a national societal value. It’s so powerful and righteous that we even resist on behalf of others. Liberals do not do this.
Let me say that again: Liberals do not resist on behalf of others. They do not give a damn about others. They use others.
Liberals interfere, obstruct, obfuscate, confiscate and lie not for the benefit of others, but on behalf of themselves; They actually believe that's what politics is all about, gain. (With a sprinkling of genuine public service.) They don;'t realize that service is others first, yourself second. The clue is the record that the so-called beneficiaries never really receive the benefit of the interference or underhandedness the liberal justified in lip service.
The Civil Rights Amendment was obstructed by the Democrats, pushed through nevertheless by the Republicans. The Republicans attempted it a hundred years earlier, too, at the inception of the Republican party, but were frustrated by the Democrats. The 1965 movement was a great idea (lip service) but when it came time to deliver, the Democrats’ bluff was called and they moved to stall it’s approval (obstruction). This tactic repeats itself throughout liberal politics, beginning from the time of Lincoln, from violent crime to education to liberty.
Which brings us to...
#5. Erasing history and silencing opposing views. Through legal filings, lies and general intimidation, unpatriotic persons are quick to deny Americans the American way of majority rule, honest debate and due process. Theirs is not just another political opinion: this is the justification of an enemy who is not working for common goal anymore but differing on method (as they announce in lip service), but an enemy working for an entirely opposite goal (as is evident in their total record).
On of the greatest clues of how liberals hate America so much is how they brazenly side with our enemies and indicate they view the situation in law enforcement terms instead of tactical terms of immediate reality. Remember that when liberals claim to work on behalf of others, there is a stealth objective underneath.
Here is the key to how we handle the unpatriotic from now on.
First, we take leftist opposition seriously not as another opinion, but for what it is: a stealth movement against America. It is time to understand and accept that liberals are not patriotic Americans merely differing with the sensible on method, but individuals with an axe to grind who make it clear by their actions that they differ on objectives. Liberals do not want what Americans want.
Second, we commit to go forward without them. Their own excess baggage and hatred of everything we stand for will never allow them to cooperate. This necessitates Americans’ becoming partisan once again, a return to unabashed patriotism. It’s not unseemly or bad etiquette to be partisan. The liberals have been having a partisan field day for forty years – after having convinced everyone else not to be partisan.
And third, we never cooperate with them again. The time for that has passed, as they have squandered our good faith and used us for our good will. We understand much more clearly now since the 2004 election that America is a majority of conservative persons with values much healthier, happier and more constructive than the inner anger and underhandedness of Democrats. We understand much better now through comparing notes nationwide and even worldwide what we have in common happily and on the kind of country we really want: one of fair play, ethics, intact and clearly defined family, and a non-interference directive in every aspect of our lives.
Are Liberals unpatriotic?
Yes, they are. When they disparage and deny others their self-reliance, when they refuse to play by the rules, when they steal archival documents, when they disrespect the concept of resistance to destructive change, resistance to real justice in America, when they move to silence opposing views, when they become underhanded and go behind our backs in legislation and in courts, including destroying protections of the Fifth Amendment, and when they are so evidently against our way of life in the very erasing of U.S. history – even though they benefit so very much from these values – then, they are most unpatriotic.
Americans would not do this to other Americans.
___________________________________________
John Longenecker is author of The Battle We Fight, available at online booksellers. His website is www.nationwideconcealedcarry.com
<< Home