The Color of Crime
By Nicholas Stix
Imagine if one demographic group in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively crime-free group? Wouldn’t you want to know about such differences?
But we don’t have to imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in the ground-breaking new report, The Color of Crime, released by the New Century Foundation, the organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine.
* “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”
* Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.
* “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.”
But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)
* Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. “Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.”
* The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.
* “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
But how can that be, when for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the majority of the victims of black crime were themselves black? But it has been true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the color of the latter’s skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of lying and laziness.
* Far from being guilty of “racially profiling” innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: “… blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes.”
* “… police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals.” (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.)
* “[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car.”
Well, as everyone knows, innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely ignore such statistics. After all, isn’t that what the NAACP, Village Voice, New York Times, and countless black “activists” and prominent academics have been saying for years? After all, although the folks insisting on racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn’t produced by the right sort of people. (And of course, “the right sort of people” doesn’t tell the truth about race and crime.)
* Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, “blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites” in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.
* “… the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct.”
* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives.
* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit “white collar” offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate.
* The single greatest indicator of an area’s crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income and education, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate.
Things are actually much worse than the above notes suggest. As The Color of Crime notes, the feds inflate white crime statistics by counting Hispanic offenders as white; at the same time, “Hispanics are a [hate crime] victim category but not a perpetrator category. If someone attacks a Mexican for racial reasons, he becomes a Hispanic victim of a hate crime. However, if the same Mexican commits a hate crime against a black, he is classified as a ‘white’ perpetrator. Even more absurdly, if a Mexican commits a hate crime against a white, both victim and perpetrator are reported as white.” Thus, the number of white perpetrators is bloated, while the number of white victims is constricted by the federal double-standard.
But things are even worse than the study shows. It fails to note, with black-on-white male prison rape an institutionalized sport among black inmates, that hundreds of thousands of white men have thus been victimized but never counted by the government. Meanwhile, white-on-black male prison rape is virtually non-existent.
Some of the study’s many sources were the FBI’s uniform crime reports (UCRs); the feds’ National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS), in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all demographic groups, were called; the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS); Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs); State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS); National Youth Gang Survey; Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP); and National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP). The succinct report slays dragons in the course of mere footnotes, such as its nailing of tenured California State University criminology professor Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, who in her book Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies, the reality of interracial violence be damned, depicted whites only as perpetrators, and not as the victims of hate crimes.
The Color of Crime – not to be confused with a 1998 piece of propaganda of the same name by tenured University of Maryland professor of criminology, Katheryn K. Russell -- is the most scientifically rigorous research on crime and race available. It’s the state of the art.
The mainstream media will surely be anxious to publicize and discuss The Color of Crime. After all, hasn’t the public been inundated since the late 1990s (and ultimately, since the 1960s) with dubious charges of racism (“racial profiling”) against law enforcement and the justice system? And don’t the MSM always tell us that they will report on anything newsworthy? After all, the New York Times claims to be “the newspaper of record.”
In a future column, we shall see just how the MSM has responded to The Color of Crime.
In any event, the report gave in precise numbers what any sentient being over the age of twenty and living in the United States has long known. A 75-year-old Irish neighbor of mine is a retired nurse who was run out of a once-lovely Brooklyn neighborhood forty years ago by “integration” (read: brazen black crime in broad daylight). During a friendly conversation during a quiet morning on our peaceful street last spring she said, “The problem is … you know what the problem is.”
Imagine if one demographic group in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively crime-free group? Wouldn’t you want to know about such differences?
But we don’t have to imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in the ground-breaking new report, The Color of Crime, released by the New Century Foundation, the organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine.
* “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”
* Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.
* “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.”
But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)
* Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. “Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.”
* The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.
* “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
But how can that be, when for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the majority of the victims of black crime were themselves black? But it has been true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the color of the latter’s skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of lying and laziness.
* Far from being guilty of “racially profiling” innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: “… blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes.”
* “… police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals.” (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.)
* “[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car.”
Well, as everyone knows, innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely ignore such statistics. After all, isn’t that what the NAACP, Village Voice, New York Times, and countless black “activists” and prominent academics have been saying for years? After all, although the folks insisting on racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn’t produced by the right sort of people. (And of course, “the right sort of people” doesn’t tell the truth about race and crime.)
* Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, “blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites” in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.
* “… the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct.”
* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives.
* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit “white collar” offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate.
* The single greatest indicator of an area’s crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income and education, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate.
Things are actually much worse than the above notes suggest. As The Color of Crime notes, the feds inflate white crime statistics by counting Hispanic offenders as white; at the same time, “Hispanics are a [hate crime] victim category but not a perpetrator category. If someone attacks a Mexican for racial reasons, he becomes a Hispanic victim of a hate crime. However, if the same Mexican commits a hate crime against a black, he is classified as a ‘white’ perpetrator. Even more absurdly, if a Mexican commits a hate crime against a white, both victim and perpetrator are reported as white.” Thus, the number of white perpetrators is bloated, while the number of white victims is constricted by the federal double-standard.
But things are even worse than the study shows. It fails to note, with black-on-white male prison rape an institutionalized sport among black inmates, that hundreds of thousands of white men have thus been victimized but never counted by the government. Meanwhile, white-on-black male prison rape is virtually non-existent.
Some of the study’s many sources were the FBI’s uniform crime reports (UCRs); the feds’ National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS), in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all demographic groups, were called; the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS); Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs); State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS); National Youth Gang Survey; Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP); and National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP). The succinct report slays dragons in the course of mere footnotes, such as its nailing of tenured California State University criminology professor Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, who in her book Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies, the reality of interracial violence be damned, depicted whites only as perpetrators, and not as the victims of hate crimes.
The Color of Crime – not to be confused with a 1998 piece of propaganda of the same name by tenured University of Maryland professor of criminology, Katheryn K. Russell -- is the most scientifically rigorous research on crime and race available. It’s the state of the art.
The mainstream media will surely be anxious to publicize and discuss The Color of Crime. After all, hasn’t the public been inundated since the late 1990s (and ultimately, since the 1960s) with dubious charges of racism (“racial profiling”) against law enforcement and the justice system? And don’t the MSM always tell us that they will report on anything newsworthy? After all, the New York Times claims to be “the newspaper of record.”
In a future column, we shall see just how the MSM has responded to The Color of Crime.
In any event, the report gave in precise numbers what any sentient being over the age of twenty and living in the United States has long known. A 75-year-old Irish neighbor of mine is a retired nurse who was run out of a once-lovely Brooklyn neighborhood forty years ago by “integration” (read: brazen black crime in broad daylight). During a friendly conversation during a quiet morning on our peaceful street last spring she said, “The problem is … you know what the problem is.”
11 Comments:
Very courageous Mr. Stix. But be warned, Sacred Cows do not die quietly; they moan, they wail and make noises that sound like "rrraaaacissst." So plug your ears and keep fighting the good fight.
Mr. Stix,
Thanks for going out on a limb.
The Polititcal Correctness groups can't wait, for only one can imagine their response.
Maybe your next column, The Color of Political Correctness??
Good post, but the color of political correctness is easy and easily, insidiously semitic.
Racist White Devil!!!
Stop giving false numbers to people to make your evil race seem better than blacks. You are just mad because blacks are stronger and more deadly than you weaker race. Every one know blacks were the first people on earth from the center of civilization, Africa. Whites are just a weaher of spring that has lost many of the great physical strengths that blacks still obtain such as . resistance to the sun jumping ability and over all strength.
STOP TELLIN LIES ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE HAVENT YOUR PEOPLE OPPRESSED OURS FOR LONG ENOUGH.JUDGEMENT DAY WILL COME.
"Johannes said...
"Good post, but the color of political correctness is easy and easily, insidiously semitic."
Well, then that makes me politically correct, because I am definitely a Jew. But then, how can my post be any good?
"Anonymous said...
"Racist White Devil!!!
"Stop giving false numbers to people to make your evil race seem better than blacks. You are just mad because blacks are stronger and more deadly than you weaker race. Every one know blacks were the first people on earth from the center of civilization, Africa. Whites are just a weaher of spring that has lost many of the great physical strengths that blacks still obtain such as . resistance to the sun jumping ability and over all strength.
STOP TELLIN LIES ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE HAVENT YOUR PEOPLE OPPRESSED OURS FOR LONG ENOUGH.JUDGEMENT DAY WILL COME.
"12:53 PM"
You know damned well that the numbers are true; that's why you're angry about me providing them. Why is it that racist, subhuman scum like yourself always screams "liar" when a white man tells the truth? And you have the nerve to call people "devils"? Oh, but I just remembered: You don't have any nerve, bitch. That's why you didn't sign your name.
(For my sane readers, "Judgment Day" is code for the great black massacre.) As for Judgment Day, who's going to kill me, you? I don't think so.
Crime identifies a person's inability to succeed or cope in society. They take and don't ask.
Crime-rate figures may indicate common factors. I suggest skin colour is a misleading tool as it hides the more accurate figures of ethnicity, cultural-background, and social-environment rather than a general sterotype for racial propensity to crime. This is what I would rather see here. A more educated approach.
A Black Man does not exist any more than a White Man exist. The French will behave differently to an Australia as a Zimbabwian to a Nigerian.
The imaginations of skin tone are therefore for the timid.
Yet for years now Americans have built up an image of racial groups based on the hue of their skin -that people go to government for hand-outs or these mythological groups!
If a child is going to be born to us already knowing they'll live a life of crime then a sane society will legalise abortions.
Of course there are no genetic criminals, but there are genetic temperments.
When you look at the host cultures from which disparate peoples spawned, they have well developed rituals and Offices that keep people in check, learned over the centuries. Some very tough laws indeed.
Alas, American Free Society may be too much too soon for many as it was when in the UK they had the Industrial Revolution and people flocked to the cities to find new ways to be unhappy.
First generation immigrants have always been on the whole civil and self policing because they carried a culture with them. The second generation did not believe or want to take on their parent's values as they half-saw the values expressed by their indiginous peers. They want everything but have not learned the trick and subtlties of dancing to a lighter cultural rhythmn, especially when a cruder culture is expressed at home. They were and still are the bane of society through excess and learn the hard way.
The negativity produced through failure and rejection creates a schizm and an angry sub-culture with inverted elitism which others can exploit to their advantage. (NIKE - No Intelligence Knowledge or Experience).
The way we think does have something to do with our physical breeding, our temperment. You can breed a more subservient or aggressive person. Just as communists killed their intelligensa and left a more complient gene-pool; the ability for self control, and the degree of consciousness they can achieve is determined. You just know it when a 'bad' family moves in next door. This is called culture.
Our 'White America' was formed by enlightened people from an out-lawish nation with the indigenous Indians decimated, and they left a legacy for all peoples to aspire to greater things. The American Dream.
People can make this dream harder for their dreams might just be to sit on a bigger pile of dung than anybody else. Even their religions twist what was meant by good men.
I will suggest therefore that poor breeding and education maketh the man, that one-person-one-vote will not lift that person up because what they need a benign autocracy and what we get are benign dictators who pander to each group and will not make a better inclusive society.
Over and over you hear again discounting race because race is only about skin color. This is clearly not true although that is one of the factors. Obviously there are racial differences among the White race that are biological. To ignore genetics you might as well put yourself in the stone age and delude yourself that we all came from Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago. I hear many objections like culture immigration and wealth. These are all factors in crime and cultures and such but these are all accounted for when doing many studies for race, crime, iq and genetics. They know people will have these objections and yet people never stop raising the same objections based on a faith that we are all inherently equal or just about equal and anything that shows a derivation thereof is coincidental or based on racist studies or racist people in society.
Gurav,
"The most recent ancestor of all males living today was a man who lived in Africa around 59,000 years ago, according to an international team of researchers."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/999030.stm
So through about 4,000 generations we have ended up with the present wide-variety of Adams walking about thinking they are something very different when they are not.
What does make them slightly different, no more than a distant relative, is genetics. This affects intellect, temperment, and the way people form societies.
It is only in say the last 200 years, 6 generations, that these disparate Adams have been thrown back together again. And if they hadn't met up, continuing a hundred thousand years to mate in isolation, they would have evolved into different species.
But already people complain about 'racial' differences (though we used to complain about a person just because they came from a different part of town) and if we are going to trancend these instincts of zenophobia, we are going to have to learn to become conscious of our own short-comings before we condemn what people cannot help about themselves.
A minority observer
I think the data pretty safe that represents the percentages of crimes committed by Blacks. Over the years, from observation to newspaper to various crimes in the community. The most violent, brutal, and unhumanilty crimes are committed by African-Americans. This group is violentist group. Something to do with genetic that they are hypo in physical and majority of the crimes are physical and mental aggression. We don't need these people in America.
After years of observation of the sheer hideousness of black crime and of the "Animal American" race generally, I have reached the conclusion that barring the repatriation of these beasts to Africa, the only possible solution is to BRING BACK LYNCHING! It seems that this is the only language that these subhumans understand; the ONLY way to limit if not entirely eliminate their attacks on civilized humans (I certainly do NOT object when they attack and hopefully kill each other in acts of "ape-on-ape violence"). Of course, this still leaves the problems of welfare subsidies, public housing and the myraid other ways in which the rest of us endlessly subsidize their truly bottomless pit of utterly hideous social pathologies and subhuman moral degeneracy.
Post a Comment
<< Home