BLAIR PLEDGES TO GET TOUGHER ON MUSLIM THREATS
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair wants tougher policies and follow through in ridding his country of Muslim murderers global. He’s not satisfied with the current policies that he considers too soft on criminal types.
This then points the finger at Home Secretary Charles Clarke. Blair, according to Toby Helm, Chief Political Correspondent for the Telegraph News, is poised to replace Clarke if the latter does not up the grade on corralling the malcontents bringing potential harm to British citizens.
Once again, the freedom-based nations are faced with the gradation of ousting the Islamic killers international who hold to making Islam the rule for the planet. This is going on in every democracy in the world. Leaders are in a quandary as what laws to put in place and what policies to place in cement in order to head off further slaughtering schemes.
Sleeper cells are known to exist in the free world. These are circles filled with Muslim killers potential who have been mentored in bombing schools, churches, and entire neighborhoods. They are fed by 4000 Muslim web sites that provide data in how to carry out the Koran dictates to slay every non-Muslim, the latter considered “infidels.”
Therefore, when Blair seeks to get tougher on the threat in his own country, he needs alongside him government ministers who are of like mind. At present it is said that Clarke is too easy on criminal types, does not want to imprison, and would rather be less radical in his approach to the Muslims thought to be possible terrorists.
“Tony Blair regards Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, as far too soft on crime and is planning a sweeping Cabinet reshuffle before Christmas to make his Government more radical, his biographer has claimed,” Helm reports this past weekend.
One of Blair’s aides told media that the Prime Minister has never been that keen on Clarke’s abilities. “’He finds him too tame.’” That’s the latest word on the relationship between the two men.
Clarke has a profile of being not all that impressed with putting persons behind bars. He has a history of siding with attorneys. And Clarke has a reputation for being “worried about criminalizing antisocial behavior.”
The Prime Minister indicates that he does not need an individual of that type in a position that calls for heavy-handed follow through to tough policies recently put in place. Blair has let it be known that the “rules of the game have changed.” That is, Britain will not tolerate any more blow-ups, no more intrusions into British civility and is prepared to oust any troublemakers major.
Blair is more than willing to put antisocial behaviorists in prison — the sooner, the better. Clarke is not all that ready to do that, hence the tension between the two.
All the while, freedom-based nations’ leadership wrestles with what to do with the killing cult named “Islam.” Are Muslims to be interned? Are they to be deported? Are they to be corralled and then informed singly what their fate is? Are Muslim professionals to be put on the same par as known terrorists, considering that every Muslim is under Allah’s dictate to kill non-Muslims or be slain by zealot Muslims?
The questions add up to the fact that there is a major confrontation taking place between worldwide Muslims and non-Muslims. In other words, we have entered World War III.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair wants tougher policies and follow through in ridding his country of Muslim murderers global. He’s not satisfied with the current policies that he considers too soft on criminal types.
This then points the finger at Home Secretary Charles Clarke. Blair, according to Toby Helm, Chief Political Correspondent for the Telegraph News, is poised to replace Clarke if the latter does not up the grade on corralling the malcontents bringing potential harm to British citizens.
Once again, the freedom-based nations are faced with the gradation of ousting the Islamic killers international who hold to making Islam the rule for the planet. This is going on in every democracy in the world. Leaders are in a quandary as what laws to put in place and what policies to place in cement in order to head off further slaughtering schemes.
Sleeper cells are known to exist in the free world. These are circles filled with Muslim killers potential who have been mentored in bombing schools, churches, and entire neighborhoods. They are fed by 4000 Muslim web sites that provide data in how to carry out the Koran dictates to slay every non-Muslim, the latter considered “infidels.”
Therefore, when Blair seeks to get tougher on the threat in his own country, he needs alongside him government ministers who are of like mind. At present it is said that Clarke is too easy on criminal types, does not want to imprison, and would rather be less radical in his approach to the Muslims thought to be possible terrorists.
“Tony Blair regards Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, as far too soft on crime and is planning a sweeping Cabinet reshuffle before Christmas to make his Government more radical, his biographer has claimed,” Helm reports this past weekend.
One of Blair’s aides told media that the Prime Minister has never been that keen on Clarke’s abilities. “’He finds him too tame.’” That’s the latest word on the relationship between the two men.
Clarke has a profile of being not all that impressed with putting persons behind bars. He has a history of siding with attorneys. And Clarke has a reputation for being “worried about criminalizing antisocial behavior.”
The Prime Minister indicates that he does not need an individual of that type in a position that calls for heavy-handed follow through to tough policies recently put in place. Blair has let it be known that the “rules of the game have changed.” That is, Britain will not tolerate any more blow-ups, no more intrusions into British civility and is prepared to oust any troublemakers major.
Blair is more than willing to put antisocial behaviorists in prison — the sooner, the better. Clarke is not all that ready to do that, hence the tension between the two.
All the while, freedom-based nations’ leadership wrestles with what to do with the killing cult named “Islam.” Are Muslims to be interned? Are they to be deported? Are they to be corralled and then informed singly what their fate is? Are Muslim professionals to be put on the same par as known terrorists, considering that every Muslim is under Allah’s dictate to kill non-Muslims or be slain by zealot Muslims?
The questions add up to the fact that there is a major confrontation taking place between worldwide Muslims and non-Muslims. In other words, we have entered World War III.
<< Home