It is imperative that one religion speaks about another, particularly when a religion fosters killing off those not devoted to that religion.
A killing cult is on the planet. Its name is "Islam." It poses as a world religion. It’s not. It’s a murdering onslaught intent on wiping out every non-Islamic alive.
Therefore, the World Council of Churches, given to its political involvement over many decades, must come to the fore in regard to truth. If the WCC states in its purpose that it exists to further truth among nations, then this is surely the time for the WCC to spell out truth regarding the Muslims.
Yet the WCC continues to say nothing.
Now that is exactly what those who disagree with the WCC expect of the WCC. Basically the WCC is composed of theological liberals. There may be a token conservative in the roster, but it is just that — a token. One might even regard the token as a spectator group looking over the WCC from close stance. There are those not quite sure of the WCC; therefore, they are hanging around near the playing field to scan and see.
But by and large, the WCC is made up of those who are not evangelical, conservative believers. Of course the WCC of late has been courting the evangelical community in hopes of cleaning up its liberal image as well as augmenting its membership dues. However, genuine evangelicals still look with suspicion on the WCC because of its diluting traditional Christian doctrine.
Therefore, with the WCC’s history of moving into the political arena on occasion, usually with support given to liberal causes on one continent of another, sometimes even subversive tangents not the least bit in agreement with the New Testament gospel, it is uncanny that the WCC remains silent regarding Islam.
Islam is a cult — a slaying cult. It poses as a religion. It is in combat with all other planetary religions. Therefore, the WCC should step to the plate and give forth the real definition of Islam, call for Muslims to quit their killing spree, and demand that Muslim clerics in particular declare war on their own.
Instead, as evangelicals expect, the WCC keeps going on its self-contained, self-protective way. If the WCC fights any body, it’s a conservative, genuinely Christian body. Even though at present there are olive branches extended to the conservative, "Bible believing" denominations, yet the WCC base is still theological liberalism and it appears it always will be. That’s where the power clutch is.
Consequently, one more void yawns upon the world community. It’s the open mouth, but saying nothing tongue, of the World Council of Churches — all in the light of daily carnage set loose by an opposing religion — indeed a cult — intent on extinguishing all groupings except their own, including the conclave known as the WCC.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said that he would not have Jews forced of their Gaza Strip homes if there was war going on, that is, any humans fighting any humans.
That in itself was a test of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas’ hold on power over his own. Obviously, Abbas has no real power over his own. His own are owned by the Koran’s Allah. Period.
Koran’s Allah demands that all Muslims fight to the kill every non-Muslim. Cowardly Muslims are to be slain for relenting.
Therefore, the projected pull out of Jews from Gaza this July may not happen. That would mean that the Jewish rabbis and laity who have said they would commit the whole matter to Jehovah in prayer may be having those particular petitions answered. There may be no leveling of the Jewish dwellings.
Of course, even to the atheist, what Sharon had planned against his own people and civil policy was evil. One does not program Jewish police forces to manhandle Jews so as to drag them from their living rooms. Sharon had scheduled just that.
It’s hard to believe that the United States backs Sharon in the move to have Jews leave Gaza so that Palestinians can move in. Not only is the way Sharon planned it evil but the concept itself is evil. Yet America has gone on the side of Sharon’s Cabinet in all this insanity.
All the while America seeks world peace, particularly planting democracies wherever possible, even to scolding the Russians for not being liberty-oriented enough. So how does that stance line up with supporting Sharon’s expelling Jews from their houses in Gaza? It doesn’t.
Anyhow, Hamas is not in favor of anything peaceful or civil. Hamas is driven by blood flowing down the streets, all backed by a zealot reading of the Koran, all braced by Allah’s call to slay every infidel, all encouraged by mosque clerics who teach their congregations how to indoctrinate the young to murder.
So it doesn’t matter what the US does to echo Sharon, no matter what his Cabinet sets forth by way of mayhem against their own, Hamas will see through its own devilish agenda. With that, there could develop civil war between Hamas and Palestinian police, just as is taking place as I type. With that, Abbas could reveal himself as the emperor with no clothes.
Of course there has been no let up of Muslims slaughtering Jews and anyone else standing in the way. That is daily fare in Israel. It has not subsided.
Even Mr. Bush’s Road Map to Peace states clearly that there can be no move toward a Palestinian state established unless there is peace throughout the Palestinian community. The gauntlet then was handed to Abbas. But he cannot bring off the baseline to the Road Map; therefore, the Road Map becomes null and void. Therefore, the US support for Sharon’s Gaza demolition should become null and void.
In other words, Sharon with US backing has gone after his own in a demonic blind rush so as to cause all bloody dominoes to fall down, just as they are falling right now. In other words, the devout Jewish prayers may be answered in some round about way, as is often the case when the divine answers petitions from the believing conclave.
I am white. My white wife and I adopted a black child when he was 2 l/2 months old. I have pastored in an all-black North Carolina church. My wife and I were active in the civil rights movement of the l960s.
So it’s with no bias that I state what I state: It’s time for the moral blacks to back a moral US President George W. Bush.
This business of Bush being not in favor of blacks is a myth as large as the one endorsing slavery in early America. It just isn’t so, that is, that Mr. Bush is anti-black. Yet many American blacks of all social classes still see Bush as the enemy. Why? It’s not true.
Now whether black or white, if a person is against killing womb babies, that individual would back Mr. Bush. If a person is for keeping America from turning into a totally secularized state — with religion put on the back burner ready to fall off the stove — then that citizen is pro-Mr. Bush.
If a black enjoys supporting abortion then one can understand why that individual would support the baby killing Dems. And if a black delights in immoral nations growing in their anti-God apostasies, then I can understand how that individual would vote Dem.
So it comes down to morality versus immorality — black or white skin shouldn’t count. Yet a number of blacks keep trumpeting praises for the immoral party — the Dem conclave. And yet many of those same blacks attend churches that still sing heartily "What a Friend We Have in Jesus."
Black friends: that gospel hymn does not link up with the Dem party line. That hymn only equates with the Bush administration — plain and simple.
Therefore, when Mr. Bush speaks this week at the Black Expo, he is among black and white friends in attendance. He’s with friends!
So there is not a total sell-out of blacks to the Dem crazed evil exercise. There are those who have seen the moral light and so align themselves with Mr. Bush. Thank God.
Consequently, when the media gave coverage to the President addressing the Black Expo I wondered why even the secular press did not realize that the moral issues bring people to Mr. Bush or against Mr. Bush.
Instead, there was some blather given to past this and that gripe from blacks, particularly those holding up in the totally inefficient National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
I have thought for many years that if anyone courted the NAACP he was not all quite clear in the head. There is much to be desired regarding moral integrity in that particular organization. Therefore, it’s no wonder that they don’t come around to an ethical Mr. Bush.
However, I also thought that moral blacks who believe in Jesus as personal Savior, attending worship regularly, read and study their Bibles, should not buck Mr. Bush. I presume that they don’t, by and large.
Therefore, it just might be that it is they who are in league with the Black Expo. I have not made a study of it; but I would presume it to be so.
Now all we have to do is get the other blacks to turn in their blind eyes for coming into the political and spiritual dawn, thus realizing that the nation is as strong as the moral fiber of the likes of Mr. Bush.
As certain moderates and liberals stroke Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, the truly conservative continue to be exceptionally wary of the man.
After all, a Republican who can sit right alongside Hillary Clinton and say to the media that she would make a good President for the USA is a Republican who is not to be sliced evenly.
Furthermore, it just appears every time McCain is lauded on Meet the Press or any other news talk-out, he’s glowing to the maximum when groomed for the next Oval Office superintendent. Then he coyly hedges on his responses, of course, and so forth.
Those Republicans who play sweet sides with the Democrats, even on occasion, are to be watched with the owl glasses. There’s a pretty good chance that they are not all that Republican. I should know. I live in Maine. And we are surrounded by the Republican in Name Onlys (RINOs).
They wear the name "Republican" but that’s about it for party loyalty. No wonder the Bushes stay clear of Maine as much as possible. It must be awkward to have a residence in a neighborhood where you’re unsure of your neighbors — that is, from the Canadian border to Portsmouth, NH.
Anyhow, the latest give-away on McCain for being other than a true-blue upright Republican is his appearing in an R-rated Hollywood movie. Not only that, he considers is okay. In fact, he considers it a part of the nation’s legitimate laughter genre.
And yet this is the same McCain who warned Congress of the country going to hell in a raunchy handbasket? Yes it is.
So now we are back to a two-mouthed McCain which is exactly what RINOs are. So it doesn’t take a PhD to conclude once again that the Republican sane would be totally out of orbit even to think of nominating McCain for the highest office in the land.
According to the latest Matt Drudge Report, McCain is very much into the movie, The Wedding Crashers. In that take, the cup runneth over — with boobs, sex and strings of foul language. The film is awash in all that a family should never see, let alone a moral individual take in as pleasure.
This is the kind of stink that McCain pointed to when lecturing Congress on getting more strict against the immoral slime slithering across America. Now he’s seated right in the middle of the slime — and chuckling all the while.
The upshot of the movie is what producers wanted to break up the summer’s boredom. They concluded that the theaters were bogged down with decent fare and so rushed to insert a rousing naughty bit.
To highlight the legitimacy of it all, they asked the Arizona Senator to take part. With that, McCain followed his libido to the movie set and the rest is bad history.
So much for the moral balance of John McCain.
So much for the truth telling of John McCain.
So much for the decent folk within the Republican Party ever trusting a totally politically opportunistic presidential wannabe who in the meantime thoroughly tickles to every stroke provided him by either party, even those in Hollywood.
‘GOD CURSE THE MUJAHEDEEN!’—THE CRY NEEDED MORE AND MORE FROM MUSLIMS THEMSELVES
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
As suicide-bent crazy Muslims set themselves aglow while annihilating innocent bystanders, an angry Muslim woman cried outside a Kindi hospital. Slapping her head repeatedly, as if wanting to slap around the Muslim numbskulls who kill themselves and others, she let the world hear her.
She screeched: "May God curse the majahedeen and their leader!"
Now there is one reasonable woman. Now there is one protesting Muslim. Now there is one voice that should be echoed by every Muslim president and mosque cleric worldwide.
Does it take a relative being blown to bits or a neighborhood extinguished to squeeze out the logical wail that the so-called "holy warriors" (majahedeen) and their murdering mentors are the present-tense prime global criminals? So the majahedeed act on behalf of their divine one. Of course, the Islamic deity is Allah who is in fact Satan. That's why the Muslims cry out that America is the Great Satan, that is, in order to sidetrack the real focus on their deity to the Judeo-Christian American heritage. The same occurred in Jesus’ ministry. The religious fakes called Him Beelzebub. So what’s new?
Yet when I read what that Muslim female called out — realizing that Muslim women are considered earth’s scum by Muslim males — I could not help but want to embrace her, comfort her and thank her for saying what the rest of the Muslim world is totally reluctant to shout. They won’t even whisper it.
Instead, the rest of the Muslim world goes on its nonchalant way as if the globe is at peace, as if their religion is truly one of goodwill, as if the rest of us must forever endure the insanity of Muslim crazy horses laying low the peace-loving.
It’s just plain brainlessness mushroomed to realize that not only is this suicide fad expanding but that the devotees of this religion — actually a killing cult, not a world religion — do not pipe a peep in protest. That is, except for this frazzled woman outside the hospital.
Then I watched the recent edition of Big Brother on American TV last evening. There is one young, good-looking male in the show who is Muslim. And how do the producers portray him? They have him as the moral base to that locked-in community.
He related on last night’s show that according to his religion he will rise each morning at 5 o’clock to say prayers to Allah. With that, it showed him leaving his sleeping room for a small space where he spread his prayer mat. Then he bowed to pray. Then he returned to his resting place. Such a peaceful religion. Such a calm, mild devotee of that peaceful religion.
And so the public relations for Muslim Nice Guy continues on the USA Big Brother, no doubt prompted by the sweetness-and-light Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). It made me so incensed to think that one of our own TV programs would picture an Islamic disciple as part of the civilized community. This, in the very week we continue to be bloodied in staccato fashion by Muslim murderers thither and yon.
Until this planet wises up to realize that we all must band together — aggressively, every day, every place — to put down the suicide nutcakes, they will continue to continue.
Now this suicide act-out has become a well entrenched fancy with the Muslim young in particular. And it is the young who make up the majority of the population in each Muslim country today. Do not think that the age span is evenly spread. It is not. The largest population count in each Islamic nation ends up to be teens and young adults.
So now this youth commitment has turned into a killing spree — not only slicing up themselves but the innocent children and adults who may be in the vicinity.
World: This is the true, honest-to-God face of the Muslim religion. Take it and act. Look at it and determine to do something where you are to put down these riotous lunatics once and for all.
IT’S OVERTIME FOR MUSLIM ‘LEADERS’ TO SPEAK VS. MUSLIM CARNAGE
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
The spoiled brats of this Earth must be Muslim leaders who sit on their hands while their zealots blow up human beings. There is simply no other way to look at.
So when Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas actually condemned Muslim killers via the worldwide press, that should make a slight dent in the delay.
Month after month, year after year, decent people of this Earth have waited for Muslim leadership — Muslim despots in particular, along with Muslim clerics — to holler loud and clear against idiotic Islamics who kill people for the sake of bloodletting.
But instead, we have witnessed civilized voices crying out for sanity to envelope the global community while Muslim loudmouths shut up tightly against their own cultic fruitcakes. It’s one of the most blatant on-going acts of callused non-action that history has ever witnessed — daily.
Abbas spoke out forthrightly against the Islamic slaughterer who took his own life and others at a very busy intersection in an Israeli coastal village. Two women shoppers were shot into the air as the bomber sped his own life into Allahland where prostitutes awaited with maximum orgy-laden pleasures for his everlasting. All this is promised via the Koran for the suicide-bent who slay infidels plus any cowardly Muslims who won’t subscribe to the game of leveling innocent people.
Abbas actually said that the bombing was a "crime against the Palestinian people. No true patriot could carry out this kind of action. . .Those who are responsible must be punished."
Punished? Did Muslim Abbas really say the word "punished?" It appears so.
Of course, Abbas could have added that the bombing was not only a crime against the Palestinian people but all peoples of the planet. Perhaps inclusiveness will slide into his next press release; but at least for now we will live with what he was daring enough to state to the media.
Now the next question is this: Why does Abbas stand alone in this speak-out? And the next question following that question is this: Will Abbas continue to speak out against such atrocities flung at nice mortals going about their daily business?
It is horrific that Muslim leadership — it galls me even to use such a well-respected term in relation to the political and religious slobs — don’t grab their microphones to speak hour by hour against their "brethren" who live out the bottom line of the Muslim cult.
Keep in mind that Islam is not so much a religion among world religions as a killing cult. There is no other religion on Earth that espouses killing off those who disagree with its tenets; yet Islam does just that by the decrees of the Koran’s Allah.
So it is that Muslim henchmen-latent-killer-wannabes continue on with their plush lifestyles of grandeur and opulence, allowing their brainless Islamic compatriots to wreck the world’s peace. How can such individuals even claim a conscience let alone a place of power under the Lord’s high sun?
Yet they do — without apology or qualms of conscience.
Such are the emissaries of the devil himself. Such are the devotees of the religious cult from hell’s canyons.
PICK YOUR EVIL POCKET. BUSH: AMERICA WILL NOT RETREAT
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Evil will always be with us. Pick your pocket.
I have often said (to change the figure of speech), "In every garden there is a snake." It all dates back to Eden.
Since Eden’s serpent slithered across the turf, the devil has been in the plan. It’s a given in a spiritually damaged world. Therefore, only the fools hope for a perfect sphere here. And the fools of course are the political liberals who promise the perfect world while demanding the conservatives provide it.
America is now in World War III. It’s a new kind of war. It’s global. It’s enveloping every nation.
It’s seen through by Muslim murderers global. This is not only a military war. It is a religious war. The religion of Islam is written in hell. The Koran’s Allah is Satan. The Koran’s mosques with clerics are locales with henchmen for demons.
In combating the present-tense overwhelming evil presence, United Stages President George W. Bush declared to the FBI Academy: "Here in America, the FBI has helped break up terrorist cells and financing networks in California, in Oregon, Illinois, North Carolina, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Florida and other states.
"And one of the important tools federal agents have used to protect America is the Patriot Act. I call on Congress to reauthorize the 16 critical provisions of this act that are scheduled to expire at the end of this year. The terrorist threats against us will not expire at the end of this year, and neither should the protections of the Patriot Act."
Of course, this statement is only one of many that the President presented to his audience, all having to do with protecting freedom in America while advancing liberties abroad.
As I contemplated Mr. Bush’s speech, I thought of the two powerful dimensions at work. The one is the President’s resolve and the other is the enemy’s easy maneuverings.
It does not take much thought nor planning nor courage to strap bombs to one’s body, then let loose. Any teen-ager can do it. And there are plenty of them around, such mentored by Muslim idiots.
It takes much maneuvering to protect a nation from the brainless and immoral. It takes immense planning, equipment, personnel, and strategic programming to undermine the senseless foe, to outwit the suicide-bent hell-engineered Muslim.
That’s the present-tense dilemma.
Yet America will see through its endeavor to overcome the juvenile, crazy, and evil Islamic enthusiasts. America will not give in. America will not call retreat. America will continue to continue.
That’s what Mr. Bush was saying in his delivery. That’s what grassroots, conservative, moral America holds with firm conviction.
Therefore, it behooves America to have a vital spiritual presence. God honors those who keep true to His eternal verities. Consequently, God will support and encourage as well as protect His own.
Moreover, it is imperative that America retrieve its Judeo-Christian heritage in full force — on the personal and national levels. That means dousing the apostasy set loose throughout much of America’s sanctuaries. That has occurred in recent years via the homosexual presence taking over pulpit and pew for another evil pocket.
The upshot of it all in waging World War III is that America is only as strong against the evil ones as America is aligned with the God of the Bible.
The more America prays to the biblical divinity, worships Him, lives out His dictates and obeys His daily guidance, the more America will experience God’s intervention on the side of the righteous.
When America abdicates its Judeo-Christian heritage for secularism or cultic displays such as Scientology, New Age or Kabbalah, America will slip into the enemy’s grip.
Such a fuss made over Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers claiming there are differences between female and male brains. Therefore, men and women have various differing aptitudes and abilities, not all similar between the genders.
For that Summers was "run out of town" by feminists and supporters. For that he was scalded by the liberal media and like enthusiasts in Cambridge. For that he endured much emotional anguish because of the small minded ones who cluster about for the politically correct at Harvard, the supposed citadel of broad minded think tank braggadocio.
It is so interesting to read the letters to the editor of HARVARD MAGAZINE concerning the President’s brave stance. Since his stating his opinions on the subject some time ago, letters continue to be published in the magazine, the most recent issue being July-August 2005.
There Christopher Frederickson, graduate of the class of 1967 wrote: "With 35 years’ experience in the doing and the university teaching of behavioral neuroscience, I can assure you that the brains of men and women are substantially different, when measured by anatomy, functional anatomy, or function (behavior)."
As soon as I read that I wondered why other thinkers located on Harvard campus did not know that basic data. What is going on there? Here there is a Harvard graduate living in Galveston Island, Texas, who provides a fundamental concept that should have been elementary knowledge to the Harvard faculty. Yet obviously it was not.
How loosely can bounce the brain cells of the liberal elite when they keep intact their prejudices. How sad that such intelligent potentials can fall so deeply into their own biases. Yet such is the case. Such has been the case as long as there have been politically correct liberals who believe that their positions are eternal verities.
Frederickson goes on: "Were it not so, by the way, homo sapiens would be qualitatively different from the rest of the mammals ever studied in this respect, all of whom also show sexual dimorphisms of the brain and of behavior. We homo sapiens are pretty darn cute, to be sure, but qualitatively different from the rest of the phylogeny in brain (or kidney, or lung. . .) anatomy and function? Not likely."
Now would not the general public as well as academic community worldwide have concluded a long time ago that those Harvard professors in the various disciplines related to the above subjects would have known what Frederickson presented? If that were so, then Summers would have had his chorus of amens. However, since there seems to be a lot yet to be learned by Harvard instructors, I suppose it really is not surprising that liberal bias overtakes basic knowledge in a particular academic discipline.
I recall as a student at Harvard Divinity School coming upon the same leaning. I, a conservative, was exceptionally ostracized by the liberals surrounding me. Therefore, I learned early on to keep my mouth shut, endure and take note of the stream of prejudices swashing all about my presence.
In that seminary preparing persons for ministry, I came upon only one truly biblically literate professor. All the others were bound by liberal prejudices, therefore they committed themselves to demythologizing the Bible. Consequently, in my opening class in New Testament we students were informed that the virgin birth and physical resurrection of Jesus were to be dismissed as legends. How easy it is to dismiss when liberally prejudiced.
Frederickson continues: "We Harvardians should be proud to have a president who dares speak even unpopular truths. Equal opportunity, protection and access for all sexes, ethic and religious groups, and so forth is a good and mandatory thing for any society. However, the idea that because we all deserve equal opportunity we must therefore pretend that we all have equal aptitude for all things is just plain silly, and demonstrably false."
PROPHECY: SHARON DIVIDES JERUSALEM WITH FENCE. ISOLATING TEMPLE MOUNT BAD FOR JEWS?
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has proposed dividing the Holy City by a fence.
When my wife and I visited Jerusalem in 1966, the city was divided. The next year was the famous Six Day War which gave a united Jerusalem to Jewish oversight. Why then divide the city as prior to 1967?
According to Arutz Sheva’s Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu, “Dividing the city with a fence will make it easier for the PA to argue that East Jerusalem, including the Temple Mount, is not part of Israel.”
There can be no measure brought to the fore that gives increased power to the killing plots of Islamics, particularly adding to their power over the Temple Mount.
They already spread their power clutch over that geography, even to the extent of bulldozing away Jewish Old Testament history at the site of Solomon’s original Temple. They put down Jews who want to walk onto the holy grounds. They scowl at Gentile Christian worshipers who want to say prayers in that area. It’s insane.
Therefore, to divide the Holy City in such a way as to augment Muslim presence and power is truly against all that is just and logical, let alone all that is spiritually balanced.
Muslims live to kill off all non-Muslims. Therefore, their being at the Temple Mount allows them the leverage by which to attack “infidels,” as they call non-Muslims. Of all places, the Muslim might must not be added to by a Jewish Prime Minister.
According to some, Sharon does not really care that much about religion, not even his own. Therefore, he does not care that much about political issues dealing with religious sites such as the Temple Mount. It appears as if such opinions have grounds in fact.
Therefore, all the more Christians and Jews must protest this fence presence which increases the Muslim “ownership” of the Temple Mount. Of course, if Christian biblical researchers are correct, this move is just another thrust to further biblical prophecy related to the Second Coming of Christ.
The biblical prophecy states that there will be increased tension in Israel until the Second Advent. Therefore, the fence dividing Jerusalem could be another piece of the prophetic puzzle going into place. Therefore, no mortal can change that which is part of biblical prophecy.
Nevertheless, from the human reasoning standpoint, it does not seem logical to grant more Muslim might to the Temple Mount location, particularly giving the Palestinian Authority the conclusion that the Jewish care for the Mount is decreasing.
REPLACE O’CONNOR WITH CONSERVATIVE, TRULY AMERICAN JUSTICE
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Feminists want one of their own to replace Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. It just can’t happen. O’Connor fooled former president Ronald Reagan. He thought her to be conservative. She ended up being anything but.
When O’Connor thought back to her initial interview with Reagan, she told reporters that she and Reagan chatted about everything but politics. In other words, Reagan, polite—extra polite, naively polite—to the woman in the interview, just assumed her to be one of his own—conservative.
But she outwitted Reagan and went on the side of political liberals, much to the joy of feminists in particular.
This time around, that just cannot be repeated. President George W. Bush must come through for America with a justice who is truly American. We don’t need a remake of America via another liberal judge on any court. We don’t need political and religious liberals turning our nation into a secularized version of Europe.
Therefore, regardless of the gender, we need an O’Connor replacement who is moral, who is traditional-heritage American, who is anti-killing-womb-babies, who is for the biblical definition of "family" and "marriage."
We need a person of spiritual integrity.
Therefore, while moralists endured O’Connor, it is time for all moral-based Americans to rejoice in the replacement of O’Connor with one of our truly-American-own.
May Mr. Bush interview-in-depth the replacement and not simply chit chat as Reagan did. America is at the crossroads of morality or immorality. The Clinton regime held to immorality while playing the hypocritical game of appearing "spiritual," even appearing Southern Baptist Christian.
No more. Can’t be repeated. Enough is enough.
It will be the same with the replacement of Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. When it comes time to put in place the individual to sit in his seat, it must be what the Red States demanded. It must that moral individual who will champion defending the infant in the female body and the biblical understanding of sex, family and marriage.
