JUSTICE SUNDAY II CUTS THROUGH FED COURT LIBERAL BIAS

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

"Many Americans are concerned about the direction that the (Supreme) court has taken this country and the impact that it's had on the culture," said Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council, informing media regarding details of Sunday’s "Justice Sunday II."

That’s the gist of the event to be broadcast from Nashville, Tennessee, to numerous congregations nationwide. Beginning at 7 p.m. ET at Two Rivers Baptist Church, the message will be that Americans must see to it that the Supreme Court does not fly the politically liberal banner.

It is believed that a "gay marriage" item may be forthcoming soon to the highest court. If that’s the case, America’s moral-base must be ready for action against the Court sanctioning sodomy as a legitimate "marital union," according to Michael Foust of Baptist Press.

Though liberals are delivering diatribes labeling Sunday’s occasion as voiding separation of church and state, organizers proceed. They proceed because they know for certain that there is no such thing as separation of church and state in the American republic where freedom of speech is permitted to all groups. That includes Christians, though religious and political liberals would like to cut the Christian activists out of any play in molding the nation’s culture.
Therefore, on with the cause. And so it is that Sky Angel, Bott Radio Network and American Family Radio will broadcast the gathering live. Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) will schedule it on tape-delay at 10 p.m. Eastern. FamilyNet TV will show it on August 21 at 6 p.m. Eastern. It also can be viewed live online by registering at www.justicesunday.com.

Christians in particular deride court rulings that sanction killing womb babies, removing the Ten Commandments from public settings, and furthering the secularization of the nation by de-emphasizing America’s Judeo-Christian heritage.

"WDCmedia goes on record in favor of such broadcasts supportive of biblical ethics in real time, real life," Grant Swank, WDC staff writer stated. "The more the Christian perspective gets its place in the democracy sun, the better for the country. The Christian way of life is not the American plague, though liberals would have it to be. The Christian lifestyle is what insures the United States’ present moral strength."

"It is imperative that believers voice their convictions in the public place," Roni Wexler, President and CEO of the 10 Commandments Commission.

It is expected that with such a state-of-the-art Christian witness, more broadcasts will be scheduled related to other ethic-based issues. On that theme, event speakers Tony Perkins, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly and founder James Dobson, Chuck Colson, former Senator Zell Miller and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay will provide rationale for moving forward.

BAKRI MUSLIM HATE CLERIC = ICEBERG TIP

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Omar Bakri is but the tip. The iceberg is so large that one cannot measure it, though given a global stick for numbering those in the Bakri mentality.

Muslim cleric Bakri cannot get into Britain again. Home Secretary Charles Clarke says so. Good.

Next move: Take all the Bakri clones from every freedom-based country and send them to the Muslim despots, the latter sitting on their hands while Muslim murderers worldwide plot doing in the “infidels.”

The truth is that Bakri is not singular. He is plural. His number is legion.

He is the symbol of planetary mayhem staged by Islamic killers international. They are scheming through sleeper cells to take over democracies. They hate democracies for these liberty communities represent all that Allah despises. Allah does not work on democracy postulates. Allah works on sheer dictatorship. That’s why the Muslim despots align with Allah’s dictatorial policies. It is all in keeping with the killing cult known as “Muslim” or “Islam.”

Therefore, when British authorities inform Bakri that he cannot return to British shores, it should represent just the beginning of deporting Muslims. Deport them. Get rid of them. They may say they are “moderates.” However, every moderate is being lined up for the kill.

In the unholy writ known as The Koran, there is no room for moderates. In fact, moderates are considered apostate compromisers. Therefore, according to the Koran Allah all moderates must be slain by the genuine Muslim devotees.

Therefore, Islam will become the world power with all so-called moderate Muslims and non-Muslim wiped out. That is the paradise envisioned by zealot Muslims as they now draw the free world into World War III.

Everywhere is their battlefield. Every non-Muslim is their enemy. Every free country is the lax, sleeping, naïve geography set up for particular attack in that the freedoms guaranteed the just and upright are also grounds by which the killers for Allah can slay all but their own.

According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Clarke pronounced to media that Bakri being in Britain was “not conducive to the public good.” That goes not only for Bakri the killer instigator but every one of his followers, the number being unknown.

Bakri and colleagues have met continually to plan overthrow. This is not just one fanatic Muslim who has got the attention of news reporters. He represents the clot set on leveling us all.

Bakri left Britain last week for a jaunt to Lebanon. He was nabbed in Beirut. But a judge released him for “there was no case against him.” There you have it. Devotees of Allah stick together for the downfall of every freedom-based community.

They do not need any centralized office; they have now become neighborhood-based. Their codebook is The Koran. Their CEO is Allah. Their mandate is simple: take over and slaughter or enslave. The paragraphs are ad infinitum in The Koran, quotes from Allah to the disciples. And in those quotes there is absolutely no allowance for a so-called moderate Muslim.

That is why New Iraq is in so much trouble since Iraqi Freedom Operation. The freedom carriers had no idea they were coming upon a killing cult that would do in its own if the latter did not agree to slay all non-Muslims.

Therefore, as long as there is a US-led Coalition in New Iraq, Muslim murderers will slay Muslims who get in the way and anyone who represents the West. Moderates must die. Infidels must die. Only Koran-aligned slayers can live. Bakri knows that tenet of his cult and he proudly proclaims it and lives it out daily. So do his followers who meet in secret to plot their next killing field.

“A British reporter who infiltrated a group led by Bakri says there was a constant message of hate and violence,” according to CBC.

“Ali Hussain of the Times says Bakri praised the July 7 bombings and lectured young men in the group about their responsibility as Muslims to promote terror in non-believers. Bakri told the group that if they were true believers, they wouldn't condemn the bombings, said Hussain.

“Everyone in the group, including Bakri and his lieutenants have only contempt for moderates like the Muslim Council of Britain which condemns violence, said Hussain. ‘They'd say things like you shouldn't adhere to British law because by doing that you're not necessarily adhering to the law of Allah,’ said Hussain.”

Bakri’s number is legion.

VOTE: LUTHERANS VS HOMO CLERGY

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

The vote was 503 to 490. Those on the biblical side won.

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America yearly meeting delegates cast their ballots. They now oppose practicing homosexuals as clergy.

The delegates, representing 4.9 million members, also “rebuffed what many saw as an attempt to push the denomination toward approval of blessing ceremonies for same-sex couples,” according to the AP.

That means that the Protestant reformation denomination begun in the 16th century by Martin Lutheran will remain biblically grounded. Homosexual infiltrators in local congregations, regional meetings and committees as well as national conclaves worked unceasingly to bring the denomination to apostasy; however, the Holy Spirit’s guidance brought the vote on the side of divine revelation.

Homosexuals were angry. They had stood at the front of the gathering throughout the proceedings — remaining silent in voice but visual in acting out their position. It does not appear that that in itself did anything to enhance their position with pro-biblical delegates. Instead, the scripturally aligned voters took offense as this intrusion, the latter continuing even when the meeting’s leader asked the homosexual enthusiasts to disperse.

Obstinacy against biblical truth is the baseline of homosexual demonstrations in a variety of church bodies. They do not care about biblical authority nor the historic mission of the church. They especially do not care about the cause of Christ to bring salvation to lost souls. They only care about the liberal political homosexual agenda of taking over every organization they possibly can, that including the worldwide church.

In some quarters they have succeeded, such as the United Church of Christ (Congressional) and Episcopal Church of America. Of course, the Unitarian-Universalist Society that does not even want to be included within the global Christian Church has long been exceedingly pro-homosexual lifestyle.

Biblically aligned persons in these denominations have awakened to find their churches stolen from beneath them. Much of the robbery took place while genuine believers were napping in the pews, permitting the homosexual infiltration to work its way at the grassroots, then up to the national annual delegates’ votes.

The Evangelical Lutheran Church of America seems to have learned from the others’ spiritual waywardness. For that the local Lutherans in particular can thank God. They are not going to lose their pulpits nor local church mission to the ungodly infiltrators.

It may then be that the Untied Methodist Church will take encouragement from this Friday vote from the Lutherans. The Methodists are presently being inundated by homosexual enthusiasts who, like elsewhere, are bound to change the denomination toward evil.

Homosexuals are vehement, aggressive, particularly vocal and unabashed in their methodology, even to using the very language of the Methodist holiness-based denomination to champion their sodomy. In one homosexual gathering their theme was “Hearts on Fire.” That harks to Methodist founder John Wesley’s preaching and teaching on heart-holiness or sanctification — the work of the Holy Spirit cleansing the believer’s carnal nature.

“New Jersey Synod Bishop Roy Riley, president of the ELCA's Council of Bishops, said the vote was a good indicator of how the entire church was thinking. ‘This church is not ready to make major changes in its ordination practices,’ Riley said. ‘That was the crux, really.’

“Louis Hesse of the Eastern Washington-Idaho Synod said those arguing for gay ordination had not made a convincing theological or scientific argument on why they were right. ‘The case has not been made. I've heard a lot of talk about the Gospel here today and I'm beginning to wonder if I'm in the right church,’ Hesse said. ‘A Gospel of full acceptance, accepting everyone the way they are, what does that say about sinfulness?’"

That’s just the point. According to Scripture, practicing homosexuality is sin. It is anti-Gospel. It is anti-Christ. It is abhorrent to the God of the Bible. Therefore, when the church dawdles on the subject instead of defending outright anti-homosexual biblical passages, the church begins to compromise on sin. When compromising on sin, the church invites demonic forces into its holy precincts. When demonic forces overpower, the Holy Spirit is grieved, thereby leaving to find willing souls elsewhere.

Down through Old and New Testament history when God’s people permitted worldliness into the holy place, God responded with divine wrath. The denominations presently advocating homosexuality as an act smiled upon by God are inviting that same divine wrath.

Those within those denominations who are well aware of this are fearful that God’s anger could indeed bring a judgment upon the sanctuaries that would be beyond imagination, particularly when many consider such present-day apostasies as evidence of the End Times.

Other genuine, biblical believers, such as those in the United Church of Canada, have left that theologically liberal denomination, going particularly to local conservative Baptist or Pentecostal Churches where compromise is not tolerated when it comes to the Word of God.

There have been those earnest believers who have sought to bring change for spiritual revival in their liberal churches, only to discover that they are outnumbered by apostates. Having reached that point, they then leave their local congregations to join with those of biblical faith.

It has been found that denominations that preach and teach a personal salvation message, the latter springing from an unyielding loyalty to the Bible as divine revelation, do not have the homosexual infiltration.

Practicing homosexuals cannot make headway in a denomination that calls for a personal commitment to Christ, followed by a personal daily study of the Bible, followed by living out that study in real time, real life.

Such groups include the Salvation Army, Baptists, Pentecostals, independent Bible fellowships, Free Methodist Church, Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, various Presbyterian bodies, Wesleyan Methodist Church, Missionary Church, Christian and Missionary Alliance, Free Will Baptists, Seventh-Day Adventists, Church of God, Evangelical Free Church, Conservative Congregational Christian Church and others.

When homosexuals are not allowed to have their way, they often use biblical terminology to bewail their plight. Such was evidenced when the Reverend G. Scott Cady of the New England Synod complained that rejecting practicing homosexuals was “tantamount to questioning the will of God,” according to the AP.

Cady proclaimed, “’We have vacant pulpits and altars in congregations all over this country. We have people crying out for pastoral care. The Holy Spirit has said, “All right, here they are. Here they are.” Are we going to now say, ‘Thanks Holy Spirit, but we prefer something else.”'"

It is not uncommon for practicing homosexuals to appeal to the Holy Spirit, the Gospel, and even quote selective scripture passages to underline their evil. It reminds the Bible student of the scribes and Pharisees in Jesus’ day who did the same in order to endorse their protestations of Christ’s ministry.

The homosexual enthusiasts can sound quite compassionate, true to the biblical themes of peace and justice, and given to wail the present state of the worldwide church. All the while, it is their “evangelism” on behalf of the demonic that is ripping congregations apart from continent to continent.

FOOTNOTE: ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL PASSAGES IN THE BIBLE

Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."

Leviticus 20:13: "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them."

Romans 1:18-32: "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. . .For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God, or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools. . .

"Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, that their bodies might be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. . .

"For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire towards one another, men with men committed indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

"God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, malice; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice. . .without understanding. . . and, although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them."

I Corinthians 6:9: "Do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived, neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

MORE THOUGHTS ON INTERNING MUSLIMS

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Since my columns on internment for Muslims — or deporting them — I have received very encouraging emails.

The bottomline seems for those of us on this wavelength is that Muslims have brought the free world into World War III. They are attacking any surprise location. They are willing to sacrifice their own bodies in suicides. They are teaching their boys and girls how to slaughter non-Muslims, starting with Jews whom they refer to as “Jew-pigs and descendants of monkeys.”

They read from their own unholy writ, the Koran, that Allah has demanded all non-Muslims be slain from the globe. Therefore, as time moves along, the civilized nations will understand that they have been for some time sucked into World War III.

In order to deter the advancement of the enemy, the enemy must be interned or deported. To allow the enemy free access to liberties aplenty in democracies is for the democracies themselves to commit suicide. That seems to be what is going to happen if we don’t do as British Prime Minister Tony Blair is moving toward — that is, “excluding or deporting.”

I take it that by “exclude” he means intern. And by “deporting” I take it he means deporting. So let the move begin — now, past too late at present. So let the move begin today.

Therefore, for those of us who take dead seriously the Muslim intent as a killing cult agenda—they hiding nothing from their program to make Islam the power hold of the planet—we call on liberty national leaders to quit their fancy speeches of “resolve” so as to hit hard against all Muslims everywhere.

That includes the professionals and mosque clerics and 4,000 Muslim web site overseers who 24 / 7 instruct their Internet readership on how to do us all in.

We liberty folk are not inundated daily by Muslim professionals and religious clerics castigating their “brethren.” We hear not a peep from Muslim politicians who serve as lush despots. Consequently, none of them can be trusted, no matter their academic degrees or wealth or social standing.

All the more these personages cannot be trusted. They hide behind their degrees and wealth and social standing but say nothing at all to discipline the Muslim murderers global.

Further, the United Nations does nothing, says nothing, sits on its collective hands as Kofi Annan mutes himself concerning the Islamic killers international.

Therefore, to add to the logic of internment and deportation, I provide this thoughtful insight just received:

“Dear Mr Swank:

“You are right on about the Muslim threat which seems to exist with one united very scary voice after having attacked the World Trade Center, Madrid and London subways, besides the massacres in Asia.

“You provided for us a letter of a German American interned in the US during WW 2. I was interned with him and not released until September 1947.

“There is a major difference between the Muslims, your proposal, and the internment of Germans. That difference is that there was not a single incident of bombings, killings, sabotage, sending money overseas supporting foreign aggression, and/or other illegal matters by Germans and/or Italians whether interned or not.

“I need not repeat the attacks launched on innocent civilians by Muslims.

“Yet we were indeed interned, and we were all legal immigrants in this country. False papers were unknown in those days of strict immigration scrutiny.

“Therefor your position is sound, inasmuch as violence of the meanest sort was foisted upon us at 9/11, with precious little of any disclaimers by major Muslim bodies.

“I hope you would support two bills in congress S 1354 and HR 3198: The Wartime Treatment Studies Acts that would study internment as policy, analyze it, and recommend future actions.

“A nation has the obligation to defend itself and its citizens in times of peril or attack while simultaneously assuring the civil rights of all as much as possible.”

DEMS LOST THEIR SOULS IN FIGHT FOR VALUES

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Ironically, the more the Dems go for appearing as the “values political party,” the more they lose their souls. How can that happen? It can happen by lying in order to appear honest.

The more the Dems manufacture a spiritual presence while being void of genuine spirituality, the more the Dems damn themselves.

It’s as if the Dems actually conclude that real values persons are stupid. Values persons have reached their values foundation because of much thinking, research and living out real time convictions. Values just don’t happen. They grow in time because of being tested against the adversities of life.

Therefore, when Dems conclude overnight to be values friendly to America, they don’t understand that an overnight conversion like that just doesn’t happen. In fact, the Dems are acting out political opportunism and not a spiritual experience. Therefore, all the more the Dems are losing out in the spiritual department.

Now that may not be the case in the religion department for “religion” can mean anything from holding to a world religion viewpoint to holding to no religion at all. In fact, there are some who conclude that atheism is in fact a religion in that it is no-religion. That makes sense to me; all the more then the word “religion” is totally nebulous and relativistic.

But when one in America speaks of “values” it usually refers to the Judeo-Christian values base. That is, it is founded upon a biblical faith with biblical ethics. There are those of other world religions who hold to a religious ethic similar to the Judeo-Christian ethic; therefore, these persons join with Judeo-Christian values persons to groundswell all the more the genuine values quotient of the country.

However, by and large the Dems don’t fit into that anywhere. They can’t for the simple reason that they are immorally based.

In fact, some would call their program to be essentially evil in that it is a killing agenda. The Dems, without apology, defend killing off that which values persons hold dear. Dems kill off the biblical definition of sexuality, marriage, family, femininity, masculinity, as well as the defense of womb babies and elderly. They also seek to establish a totally secular state in America, thereby negating the Judeo-Christian heritage of this nation.

With that as their proclaimed party platform from shore to shore, there is no way that a biblically spiritual person of values could endorse the Dems. That is why when the Dems hark that they are “values oriented,” they become the laughing stock of the United States believers. Yet they continue to try. Again, they must conclude that the true values persons are ignorant — absolutely so.

So — again for the sake of the electorate cause — Dems have spoken for what they term “values.” In fact, Senator Jack Scott, Democrat, proclaimed to his California constituents that “I don’t think God is either a Democrat or a Republican. The moral values that I really care deeply about is justice for the poor and peacemaking and so that’s the reason that I wouldn’t call the Republican party the party of religion.”

Right there Scott gives himself away as either ignorant of a real “values” definition or playing up to the stupid crowd. For instance, one cannot be for “justice” and withhold justice from womb babies. One cannot be for “peacemaking” and still make war against womb babies. One can move from womb babies to other ethical issues and so unravel all the more Scott’s baseline.

Then there is Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid stating to media that he’s bringing God back into his party by inserting a page in the Dem’s Senate web page focusing on religious values. May the world read it and be convinced! Yes. In other words, a web site insert does not a spiritual party make. Yet Reid is trying. Reid has done this in follow through to Dems gathering in Berkeley in July to “focus on resurrecting the American spiritual left,” according to Fox News.

"’This really shows the desperation of the Democratic Party after their loss in November 2004,’ said California GOP spokeswoman Karen Hanretty. ‘They cannot appeal to the Christian right and to a lot of millions of voters throughout America who have a certain set of values.’"

And to that I’ll shout a hearty Amen!

HILLARY DOESN’T HAVE THE HISTORY TO ENDORSE GOD IN AMERICA

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

According to the Globe’s Michael Jonas, Hillary Clinton is giving forth with ambitious God words these days.

I thought when reading that that perchance one of the Dems has got the message that there are God-fearing citizens in the United States of America. Also, many of them cast their ballots in favor of United States President George W. Bush.

Dems wonder what they must do in order to win the Oval Office. They keep bantering back and forth as to how they can revive the party, some believing it to be quite dozed, if not near to demise. Obviously, at least Hillary has awakened to the reality that one place for a Dem to start is with God words. Note: I did not state "God convictions." I wrote "God words."

So it was that Hillary spoke God words to the National Ten Point Leadership Foundation and the Dorchester-based Ella J. Baker House. She was in Boston. Her audience was composed of those contributing to a fund-raising effort for an "organization that promotes faith-based solutions to social problems."

With that, NY Dem Hillary said: "There is no contradiction between support for faith-based initiatives and upholding our constitutional principles."

In fact, Hillary referred to deity over half a dozen times. She even confessed that "I’ve always been a praying person." Continuing, Hillary confirmed that in America there has to be the place for persons "to live out their faith in the public square."

The bottom line to whatever Hillary said in her speech is this: Hillary Clinton does not have the spiritual history to back up her God words. The God words, yes. The God conviction, no.

Jesus warned of those who use religious terms for their own advantage. He called them "hypocrites." Jesus stated that "if you love Me, you will keep My commandments."

It’s action, not words, that proves one’s spiritual integrity. James wrote in his New Testament letter that works and faith go together.

Hillary works for evil: killing womb babies for one. Same-gender marriage for another. Killing infants and endorsing other than the biblical definition of marriage is not in keeping with God, with the Bible, with Jesus’ commandments.

For instance, Jesus told His own that if one harms a child, it would be better for that unfeeling individual to have a boulder tied around his neck, then thrown into the sea. Hillary supports those who murder babies in female’s bodies — the arch meanness of harming a defenseless child.

Regarding marriage, Jesus reiterated what was spoken by Jehovah at creation, that is, that man leaves parents in order to be joined to wife, thus becoming one.

Countless passages against practicing homosexuality are revealed by Creator God in His eternal Word. There is no allowance for any other sexual union but that placed within the holy bond of marriage — man to woman.

Therefore, when Hillary speaks she tickles liberal religious ears at a Massachusetts dinner.

But she does not sway God. God sees the heart. And, as far as revealed Truth is concerned, God cannot find Hillary obedient to Jesus’ commandments. Mere empty, self-serving, politically opportunistic words. No personal history of biblical conviction.

It’s all on the record.

ABORTION: CNN GOES EVIL AGAINST JUDGE ROBERTS

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts is just beginning to feel the heat from hell’s fires. The enemy is poking about the coals. CNN is stirring up the pot.

CNN, according to Drudge Report, has plans to air an ad depicting Roberts in favor of abortion clinic bombings. Of course, the ad has been produced by NARAL, a womb baby killing support.

The ad upshots that Roberts filed legal papers in favor of a convicted abortion killing factory bomber.

There you will see it in the ad: a bombed-to-smithereens Birmingham murdering infants establishment. The date? 1998.

That particular building was hit seven years after Roberts put his name to the legal brief.

Liberal crazies are working overtime at CNN. Of course. They are scared to death that Roberts will end up a smoothie in favor of defending womb children. In order to cut him off at the knees, CNN depicts Roberts with dastardly deed on his hands. Who then in America would dare trust such an individual on the highest bench?

Once again, liberals can do nothing but nay-say or outright lie. They have no moral equipment by which to produce anything — and I mean anything — productive for the nation’s safety or advancement. It is not too strong to state that today’s liberals are demonic in the most obvious definition.

From the Dems in Congress to the liberal media there is nothing but anger and hate. It’s been rolling for months, years. As long as US President George W. Bush is in the White House, it will only get worse.

Last Saturday’s so-called civil rights march in Atlanta was reeking with downright hate-filled scream speeches from both liberal blacks and whites. It was mainly an attempt to fire up blacks to despise the Chief Executive.

Dem National Committee Chairman Howard Dean continues the hate speech syndrome, such having mentored quite ably the latest newcomers to the oratory style from crusted souls.

When Mr. Bush appointed John Bolton as the US Ambassador to the UN, Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi led the hate speech pack in labeling the Chief Executive everything criminal. He was a liar. He was underhanded. He had twisted his authoritative position with such an appointment. Of course, the total reverse is truth.

It is now the same with Roberts. Investigators, such as non-partisan University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Factcheck.org, scouring the ad concluded that it is nothing but barefaced lies. CNN has gone along with the lie factory that supports the infant killing factories scheme.

Once more, America comes to realize that the current liberals have nothing going for them but killing off the best the nation has to offer. Liberals kill off the biblical definition of sexuality, family, marriage, masculinity, femininity, moral-based lifestyles, womb babies and the elderly as well as the Judeo-Christian heritage that this country has always held dearly.

Then it is not surprising that Ted Turner’s CNN moves quickly into the slaughter mode when it comes to Roberts. There must truly be some quality material to Roberts’ life and work that makes the lie factory work so utterly ambitiously on the side of deceit.

THE RIGHT THING: BUSH OVERRIDES SENATETHE RIGHT THING: BUSH OVERRIDES SENATE

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

It’s the only proper thing to do. And US President George W. Bush has done it.

He appointed Eric S. Edelman to be undersecretary of defense for policy. Good. Now Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi can add that to their list of horrific deeds performed by the Chief Executive.

They both thought it absolutely horrendous that Mr. Bush put John Bolton in the United Nations as US

Ambassador. Of course, since no one can please a Democrat these days, Mr. Bush may as well do what’s good for the country.

It is so interesting to note how the Dems work against the good of the nation at every opportunity going. Some Republicans in Name Only (RINO) join them. With that thrown at the decent people of America, the latter need all the more a President who acts instead of dawdling.

Yes, it’s summer time and the living is easy. But Mr. Bush takes full advantage of every waking morning to do what is good for the country. Now this latest bypass of the Senate to fill a senior Pentagon post was imperative. Thank you, Mr. President. Edelman is the chief policy advisor to the secretary of defense.

Things bogged down in the Senate when Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) haggled over documents’ release regarding Iraq. That put a drag on the Edelman nomination. Time passed. The President considered time important and so put Edelman in the proper place.

On May 16 the Edelman nomination was placed before the US Senate. It’s now mid-August. Time to move, Senators. Since you don’t move, Mr. Bush does.

Since Mr. Bush is of course within his rights to put an official in a position without waiting for Senate confirmation when Congress is in recess, Ted Kennedy and ilk will slam dunk Mr. Bush for being the criminal type. They did it when he moved Bolton to the Manhattan sleek tower. Now expect the same regarding Edelman.

What other games have the Dems got to play "for the good of the nation" but to block every profitable move of the present President?

Carry on, Dems. And enjoy your recess. It’s probably the most productive season you’ve seen through in a long, long time — for the good of the country, of course.

ATLANTA: BLACKS DIG HOLE DEEPER VS. BUSH

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Why did Crosswalk.com ever print an article like the one on blacks blasting US President George W. Bush?

That site is supposed to be Christian. Its post regarding blacks at an Atlanta march did not smack Christian at all.

Senior Staff Writer Marc Morano wrote about blacks smearing Mr. Bush and the Republicans, such emotional displays written up as if they were levelheaded. Of course, the lambasting was emotional tirade at its harshest and yet lamest.

The bottom line for blacks is this: if they hate Mr. Bush, as Morano reported those at the march despise Mr. Bush, then they have no political party in the United States. If the blacks go Democratic, they are in league with the killing party. Dems kill off biblical definitions of sexuality, marriage and family, masculinity, femininity, a moral base to America, the Judeo-Christian heritage to this nation and the defense of the unborn and elderly.

Yet with the rage expressed at the so-called "civil rights march," blacks dug their desperate hole deeper than ever. They ranted. They screamed. They cat called. They poked at Mr. Bush as if they were at a lynching. Talk about blacks having come far since the early 60s. By their demeanor at the event, it does not appear as if those blacks attending have come any further than a flock of sheep following blind shepherds over a cliff.

Moral blacks — that is, those who are Judeo-Christian ethically based — have the Republican party and Mr. Bush in particular to thank for the state of this nation at present. Mr. Bush represents the defense of womb babies, embryonic human life, biblical definitions of masculinity, femininity, sexuality, marriage and family, the presence of God in everyday life, fostering a genuine expression of one’s personal faith in public and a return to biblical ethics.

If the blacks attending the Atlanta Saturday conclave showed up on Sunday to sing of "What a Friend we Have in Jesus" they surely don’t match their hymn messages with their anti-God stance at the march. One cannot have it both ways. A black cannot be a Bible-carrying, Sunday school attending, worshiping Christian and at the same time undercut the Oval Office that stands for what that black says he believes on the Lord’s Day.

I worked in ministry in a black church in the Carolinas during the civil rights movement. I, a white, took my stand for equality, living in the parsonage of the black pastor and worshiping in the all-black congregation. I adopted a black baby who is now in his mid-20s. That should say something of my friendship ties with those "of color."

Therefore, all the more it pains me to realize that such a mean staging could be propped up in Atlanta by blacks. All that works against the sincere black Christian community. Further, all that fires up the anti-God Dem party line. No wonder then that Nancy Pelosi was there as one of the featured speakers. And the black Christians in attendance applauded her? May God have mercy on their souls. What is with their Christian convictions?

Mr. Bush was tagged a "thief." Judge Greg Mathis of the TV program, "The Judge Mathis Show," screamed out that Mr. Bush and team are all "criminals." Hate speech obviously reached a hellish pitch throughout the gathering.

Event organizers told media that they were there to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Some celebration! It simply opened up the demons’ box for more mayhem in the American black community, except of course for those blacks who have still kept soul and head in the divine light. They only have eyes to see.

Of course, one might suspect that the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition was at the head of the hate pack. Further, leaders from the National Urban League, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the NAACP and the AFL-CIO were in prime time. And so the black hole goes deeper and deeper still. With America fighting off the killing cult known as "Islam," the country now has lost black comrades who should be right in there defending the nation’s freedoms, not blasting the President.

Singer Harry Belafonte even came to the fore for the dark forces. In his speech he referred to blacks within the Bush administration as "black tyrants." Can hate speech become more derogatory and lunatic?

Musician Stevie Wonder had to add his presence to the illogical verbal lynching raucous.

Crosswalk.com: why did you not discipline the tawdry event in your article? How could you simply post detail of such an occasion on a Christian site and say nothing to expose the anti-God madness of it all?

WHAT DID THINKERS BELIEVE BEFORE DARWIN?

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Write a column such as I did stating that evolutionary theory is pure hockum and watch for your email box to fill up with all sorts of anger.

Emailers in panic fits are now going to their therapists to get relief from my post. It’s amazing what a column can do to mentally unstable people.

Anyhow, as I read the tirades, I wondered what thinkers did before the mid-1800s? How did they get along without Saint Darwin? What holy script did they use to explain origins?

Of course thinkers prior to Darwin believed that God started everything. That is, He brought all into being from nothing — ex nihilo. It’s what is still believed by God-holding minds.

For the centuries prior to The Origin of the Species came up with us all developing from tiny bits of swiggly whatevers, human brains worked out the biblical message as given primarily in Genesis.

It is that God brought into being all that there is. He is the Alpha and Omega — the Start and Finish. God being God can do that. He doesn’t need any help from Darwin. He does not even have to have assistance from an evolutionary line up of lesser to greater.

Now there are those believers who are still mired into the evolutionary posh that they think they have to bow down to it in some fashion. Therefore, they conclude that evolution must be the method that Creator God used to bring everything from nothing. In that way, they feel comfortable living a whacky world that holds tenaciously to a lamebrain theory full of holes.

But those truly adventurous, daring Christian biblical thinkers don’t need even the crutch of evolution to explain how God did whatever He did. They just by faith conclude that God being God did what He did. He brought it off. He is the eternal One who has the everlasting powers by which to do what He sets out to do — just as Genesis relates it — and therefore God needed no help.

It is a pity that some of the younger generation have to feel that they must give some sort of academic nod to evolutionary teachers who cruise through their university classrooms with texts that preach that evolution is not really a theory. It is indeed a fact. A FACT already proven and digested and baptized as absolutely realistic.

Those of the younger generation need to understand that Genesis does not even need that kind of oblation to secular university professors, not even to professors in supposedly Christian colleges which have gone spiritually astray.

The bottom line is this: The Bible is the divine revelation. There Genesis states that Creator God did what He did. It spells it out in as much detail as any mortal needs to know in this life.

Therefore, be done with it. It was realistically tenable to generations of thinkers prior to Saint Darwin and it still works quite well for those who hold to the revelation as needing no secular assistance — none whatsoever.

Now watch my email box fill up again. That’s okay. It means more money for the therapists. And I’m sure they can use the cash.

JENNING’S ABSENCE = A PLUS FOR AMERICA

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

I’m sorry that Peter Jennings died. Death is not something about which others rejoice.

However, not talking about his cancer struggle, demise at age 67, and the sadness this brings to his family and friends, but looking at Jennings for what he did as a broadcaster, I conclude it’s a plus for American culture that he no longer carries the influence he once carried.

The same goes for Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw.

Jennings is touted along with those two as the "triumvirate" that controlled network news for years — too many years.

For many of us loyal, patriotic Americans, we could hardly stomach the mainline evening newscasts. They were dominated by the liberal presence of three boasters of what we did not believe in. How often did we consider them enemies to the American Judeo-Christian heritage, family-values and any conservative block, particularly the Bush administration.

Good riddance to the three of them, not just Jennings.

We don’t need that kind of twisted patriarchal neurosis any longer in American newscasting. We who are aligned with the moral and upright, the Judeo-Christian beginnings to our country, had to endure more times than not the snide remarks, that telling liberal smile, and the outright lies coming from those three.

Jennings was at the front of the threesome. Of course, in recent years, Rather showed himself to outrun Jennings on an issue or two. But Jennings, proud and debonair, head cocked and smile crusted for the liberal audience he played up to constantly, was right there as far to the front-left as he could get.

What braggadocio Jennings carried with him every time he managed a broadcast. He was at his crisp, curt "best" when attacking US President George W. Bush. It was very hard for Jennings to keep his anti-Bush comments subtle. He enjoyed broadcasting most when he could undercut whatever Mr. Bush was doing.

No matter what Bush progress had been made in the previous 24-hours, Jennings could always discover a downside to it. His verbal paragraphs ended with that downside remark that blew away any progress just reported. Of course, that became the hallmark for all liberal reporting — on TV or in print.

What Jennings and team did not realize was that the more they championed secularizing America, demonizing the Bush administration and endorsing liberal issues, the more they were slicing and dicing the very country that gave them the freedom of speech to carry on with such mean fare.

I could not understand how Jennings in particular could relish such broadsides against a conservative American base that in fact gave him his liberty air to breathe every morning he awakened. Not only that, that kind of America paid him his lush salary and put him center news stage day after day, year after year.

Of course, what went for Jennings goes for every political and religious liberal in the nation — and every organization they represent. Whether it’s the ACLU, the Episcopal Church or Planned Parenthood, they all enjoy the right to lambaste illogically and unfairly the ethical foundation of this nation while taking full advantage of the human rights acts that permit their carnage.

I am so content to know that Jennings will no longer give another newscast. There is no beneficial need for it. At least not in America.

AL-QAIDA DECENTRALIZES, GOES NEIGHBORHOOD-BASED

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

There are now 4,000 Web sites advocating blowing up non-Muslim communities worldwide. And they set forth the detail in how to carry it off.

The killers don’t need an underground figurehead any more. They don’t need a worldwide organization telling them what to do next. They’ve already figured out their own local plans for destroying non-Muslims.

After all, they have the killing cult workbook — the Koran. They have the divine from hell — the Koran’s Allah. They have the neighborhood mentor — the mosque’s cleric. Who therefore needs Osama bin Laden to call the shots? No one.

Therefore, decentralization is the order of the day for Muslim murderers global. They work where you live. They shop where you shop. They post their letters at the same post office that you walk into. And they are preparing to wipe you out.

Everything has changed regarding logistics. It’s become local and self-propelled. Therefore, to continue to go after bin Laden is a waste of time. To think that his program is the all-in-all is naïve. How quickly the past can become obsolete.

According to the Associated Press, mosque clerics are fiery preachers who instigate the take-over yet to occur. The local Muslims are the army set to blow up the stores and schools and community centers where you live. The Koran is their manual by which to carry out demonic deity’s dictates.

Consequently, what we have here with us is not a religion but a cult preparing to slice and dice. The cult’s spin-offs are regarded as satellite networks very well fine-tuned. They hate Westerners. They despise the republics that provide them with their daily freedoms. And they are geared to commit suicide in order to see that everything non-Muslim is extinguished from the planet. Islam WILL rule the world.

Again, note: There are now 4,000 Web sites advocating blowing up non-Muslim communities worldwide. And they set forth the detail in how to carry it off.

"’Al-Qaida version 1.0 is functionally dead,’ said Jerrold Post, a founding director of the CIA's Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior. ‘Al-Qaida version 2.0 is almost more an ideology. ... It's an adaptive organization responding to a crisis.’"

The adaptive set-up is no longer dependent upon any one force but what’s already engrained in the zealot Muslim brain. And many of these brains belong to boys and girls. Include in that number teens. These youths are springboards for blood letting in freedom-based nations’ streets. They are anxious. They are excited. They are adrenaline-rushed to lay low the "infidels."

"’We are now dealing with many little al-Qaidas with the potential of neighborhood al-Qaidas,’ Rand Corporation President senior adviser Brian Jenkins said. ‘They can operate at a lethal level.’"

It then is very difficult for local police to crack open a sleeper cell or what may be termed a "satellite network." That makes the discovering of Muslim hideouts almost impossible in some neighborhoods, particularly in cities.

All the more then that freedom-based nations deport all Muslims. Doctors cannot be trusted. Teachers cannot be trusted. Lawyers cannot be trusted. Just because a Muslim is regarded as a professional does not mean that that individual cannot kill just as well as a Muslim youngster laying low in the alley.

Note: one does not find daily a large community of professional Muslims castigating the Muslim murderers global. Why? Because the professionals believe in the same Koran as the alley-crouchers.

One does not find daily a loud outcry from professional Islamics regarding their own slaughtering the British or the New Iraqi citizenry. Why? Because these professionals hold to the same cultish tenets as the kids in the streets who strap suicide belts to their chests.

Therefore, all Muslims must be deported or interned. No tag can exempt a Muslim from being set apart for being put apart. Civilization is at stake right now. World War III has come upon the non-Muslim world. Freedoms everywhere are under assault.

"The diffuse nature of the shape-shifting al-Qaida is one reason it's hard to fight. Security services may crack one cell but find little connecting it to others. Police in Britain have failed so far to charge anyone in the July 7 attacks on three subway trains and a bus that killed 52 and four suicide bombers, an attack authorities said bore al-Qaida hallmarks.

"At the same time, fiery Muslim preachers offer a radical ideology, with few moderate voices strong enough to drown out their voices. Some 4,000 fundamentalist Web sites further spread the hate.

It is past time for freedom-based nations to do something urgent and radical. If something is not done quickly and thoroughly, freedom-based countries will deal with one explosion after another day after day. And it won’t come from a central force telling the slayers what to do. It will come from neighborhood satellite networks already in place to blow up anybody in the area.

JUDGE ROBERTS STILL A FUZZ FOR CONSERVATIVES

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Both conservatives and liberals are trying to figure out just who Supreme Court nominee John Roberts really is. Will the true Roberts please stand up?

Roberts has done some pro bono, that is, "free" work on some liberal cases. But does that add up to give conservatives the shakes? Time will tell. In the meantime, the reasoning could very well be that most of the pro bono cases coming before lawyers are in the liberal category.

To do their good time in pro bono cases, conservative lawyers sometimes are pressed to take on liberal cases just to see through their quota. Could that be the situation with Roberts?

Could be. Time will tell.

In the meantime, conservatives look back at former US President Ronald Reagan’s interview with Sandra Day O’Connor. Without asking her one question about politics — instead spending time chit chatting man to lady — Reagan appointed her to the highest court in the land. She proved a liberal. It has been posited that Reagan’s appointment of O’Connor was his biggest mistake. Makes sense to me.

And as for David Souter, give the conservatives the nay-sign on him. He was thought to help out the conservatives but instead has gone liberal more times than not.

What will Roberts do?

He is as unpredictable as ever. Talk about fuzz in the future, Roberts is it. Liberals are scared to death that they’ve got a conservative in liberal cloth. Conservatives are out of their heads concluding that they’ve got a liberal in conservative cloth.

No one knows but Roberts. That’s for certain.

Yes, Roberts did give free legal aid to assist a prisoner on death row. Does that make him a liberal? Well, it was only 25 hours of legal counsel as part of his pro bono stint. So what does that tell us? Not much.

He’s helped the poor. He’s given advice to gays. He’s walked with the forgotten and sidelined. So what does that say about Roberts? Nothing, actually, except that on occasion he’s done work to help the poor, homosexuals and the scuff-abouts who needed some legal help at some time in Roberts’ past.

Maybe he’s a good heart who likes to lift others up when they’re down — regardless of their category. Maybe he was simply seeing through his pro bono quota.

Could very well be. Time will tell.