Sponsors Secured for Five Pro-Father Amendments To Federal Law

It is a very rare moment when this movement sees positive pro-father legislation introduced in Congress.  This is because none of the leading fathers and men’s organizations are focused on legislative change (which is why advocacy organizations supposedly exist in the first place).

This is why my work has been re-focused on marriage movement and pro-family legislation.  I recommend that men’s organizations stop acting like Larry King.  Complaining never won any war.  While national media attention is certainly necessary, if the organizations behind our talking heads are not highly geared towards legislative change, our work amounts to nothing but hot air.

Certain men’s groups or activists (they know who they are) must stop selling out to horrendously anti-father feminist gay marriage and preclusive lesbian parental-rights agenda.  This is in full frontal conflict with men’s rights - courts are not going to give daddy a shot when two mommies are fighting over the children.  Those pushing feminist lesbian agenda are pre-empting the very purpose of this movement and leading it straight off a jagged feminist cliff.

Men’s advocates and organizations must focus their work serving the long-term legislative interests of men, publicly pushing positive legislative change beneficial to all men and women, in particular securing the generic restoration of heterosexual marriage as a protected institution of mutual rights, to be counted as legitimate men’s representatives.

It is manifestly clear that the men’s movement will never win the war on marriage by itself.  However, with proper guidance and direction from wise leaders, this movement can play a guiding and perhaps significant role in restoring America’s broken social fabric and economy.  We will know this is happening when men’s organizations are capable of introducing and  passing legislation in states and in Congress, and fall over backwards to work with those of us who focus our work on introducing and passing legislation such as below.

I am pleased to announce that sponsors for the following amendments to federal law have been secured by a leading pro-family advocate/lobbyist that I work with:

Bradley Amendment

Under the 18-yr-old statute, all judges are prohibited from retroactively modifying child support orders. This often produces unintended consequences such as when an obligor is in a coma, a POW, falsely incarcerated, etc. This change leaves important interstate mechanisms in place for enforcement of support while correcting the prohibition against judicial rectification of the unintended consequences that arose due to the wording of the statute. This modification gives courts additional leverage to encourage support compliance with enhanced equitable consideration.

Paternity Fraud

This change limits incentives to the States for “In-Hospital Paternity Establishment” to be granted only when those voluntary paternity establishments are accompanied by DNA proof of paternity. This will help eliminate fraud and ensure that the correct man is named as the biological father. This will provide uniformity throughout the states in dealing with paternity fraud and enable children to have access to their entire extended paternal family as well as allowing children to have the ability to obtain often vital medical history information that might save their lives.

Allowing Shared Parenting without loss of IV-D funding

Some States and NGO’s mistakenly believe that the incorporation of fatherhood programs, access programs, neutral drop-off centers, etc., that help remove obstacles to parental involvement, would jeopardize federal IV-D funds and Title I-V fund in total. This language alleviates those misconceptions and clarifies the intent of Congress to maximize parental involvement, not limit parental involvement.

Making Fatherhood Programs an Allowable Expense

This change allows IV-D Agencies to implement fatherhood programs, marriage initiatives, access and visitation programs, neutral drop-off locations, etc., as an allowable expense, rather than only through block grants, yet still pursuant to the approval of the Secretary.

Disabled Obligors – Credit for Payment

Not all states give credit for disability payments sent directly to the child. This change brings uniformity of process and eliminates jurisdictional conflicts.

© 2009, David R. Usher


Stumble It!

Discuss this article

Email This Post Email This Post

Print this page

Share/Save/Bookmark

More from David Usher

Trackback

Posted in: Uncategorized | 1,146 views

 

Comments are closed. Please check back later.

 
 
 
 
 
 
tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily® © 2001 - 2009 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter