“The end of men”
At least one male? I thought for a minute there was cause to worry.
| More from Anthrope1
Stumble It!
|
|
Join Our Mailing List
Sex and Metropolis
- TV Meteorologists Side with Global Warming Skeptics
- U.N. ‘Climate Change’ Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy
- Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?
- India: police officer set on fire by wife on International Men’s Day
- Gang accused of killing to sell human fat
- “Climate change pushes poor women to prostitution, dangerous work”
- KCTV5 INVESTIGATION: Dad By Default
- Racism the Province of Anglo Americans?
- International Men’s Day Message
- Women Starting to Lose Ground in Family Court Racket
- Wow! A Female College Student Lies About Being Raped! Unbelievable!!
- Third of Family Break-up Children Lose Contact with Fathers in Failing Court System
- Safe House for Abused Men Opening- NZ
- Launching the Bangalore Chapter of the All India Men’s Welfare Association (AIMWA)
- The Men We Use for Cannon Fodder
Latest MND Opinion
Please Support MND
Subscribe today:
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
Actually there isn't any reason to worry since without genetic diversity in time genetic disorders would increase to the point where the human race would be unable to reproduce and then die out which in my view wouldn't be such a bad idea…
Men are indispensable, because it's like ying and yang how men and women compensate each other and fit like a puzzle to become much more than the sum of it's parts. This synergy is what lead to the success of humans through time and countless amazing inventions by men that people tend to take for granted nowadays, yet depend on. The Ying cannot exist without Yang.
If you'd like the most perfect, flawless baby it must be grown in an external womb (artifiicial uterus) because during the growth of an embryo in a human womb, it is not monitored and damaging food or drink consumption does harm the baby.
By growing an embryo externally it can be monitored 24/7 and ensured that it receives the best nutrients for optimum growth an development. So artificial uterus is the only way to ensure the most perfect, (flawless) babies. That's a fact. There are two sides to a coin to create a more ideal baby.
Beside all this, a nation with a lack of men will be much weaker and more easily overpowered by a normal country, and as such won't pass the tests of time. So as you can see the Ying loses purpose and it drastically lowers prospects of success or survival without Yang.
DaPoet said, "human race would be unable to reproduce and then die out which in my view wouldn't be such a bad idea."
I have come to the conclusion that the driving spirit of Feminist Theory is precisely the extinction of humanity.
Which raises the point: could Extinction be an intentional goal of unreconstructed Feminist theorists?
It appears Margaret Sanger — the founder of the beloved "Planned Parenthood", was thinking precisely about "Extinction" — though in her case is was more like selective genocide rather than the full Extinction of the human species.
TO BE CONTINUED….
But it appears that many people — in many walks of professional life — secretly envision the Extinction of the human race. We certainly see this theme in our books, movies, and TV shows. Going to back to the classic Earth Abides (George R. Stewart), the post-Apocalyptic Sci Fi drama has been in vogue.
Battlestar Galactica is just the latest in a long line.
And certainly Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler held a common set of beliefs regarding eugenics and the idea of breeding people like livestock.
But what about practical feminist theorists like Catherine Mackinnon?
Certainly Mackinnon harbors no particular eugenicist views of which anyone is aware. And yet the practical effect of Mackinnon's legal theories directly effect the disposition of the male-female social dynamic, wherein women are artificially empowered as a special class above that of men.
TO BE CONTINUED….
Thinking of this, I am again struck by social ideations of Human Extinction. The Day After Tomorrow is a case in point. Here the people of the Northern Latitudes are the immediate victims of a natural disaster. Adding sweetness to the pie, the cause of this ecological disaster is presumed to be the very people who are most displaced by it: Caucasians.
The Day After Tomorrow possessed an evangelical commitment to Man-Made Global Warming, and presented a righteous desire to punish those it held accountable for the disaster.
It was saddening to watch this propaganda piece imprinting its Al-Gorian narrative on the masses: a social guilt trip. In my view the film was at heart cynical, pessimistic, and even genocidal. Total film gross to date: $652,771,772
TO BE CONTINUED….
To sum it all up, The Democratic coalition evidently contains the following constituent groups:
* Feminists
* Hollywood/Entertainment Industry
* Environmental Movement
I could add to this the Academic establishment. These three or four vertical groups are all constituents within the political framework of the Democratic Party, as well as the social framework of Liberalism.
Thus Neo-Liberalism has taken on much of the utopian patina of classic Marxism, wherein individualism must conform to the ideals of the secular state.
Let's take the "Artifical Womb", for example. How long will it be before the state mandates that all children *must* be incubated through an FDA-approved Artificial Womb?
Who would argue against the medical superiority of the Artificial Womb over the religious rights of a few "home school" nutjobs who want to give birth to their children the old-fashioned way?
In my view this philosophy is essentially soul destroying, because it elevates the State above the individual right of a human being to define his own path to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Thus the hazard of secular atheism is revealed in marginalizing Individual Conscience.
The extinction of the human race as the end result of embracing and following Feminist Theory is an unintended yet logical consequence of an exceptionally flawed ideology…
Not all countries embrace the destructive ideology of feminism. Those that do not have shown to be (much) more successful and stable in the long run.
It's mostly western countries that are digging their own grave due to the negative consequences of the illogical and unnatural feminism.
Feminism is one of the primary causes of western civilization's decline.
Why is the extinction of the human race considered bad? What purpose does its continuance have? Why subject generation upon generation with misery?
If there were no men, women would have no reason to go on…and vice versa… I magine a world without women. How depressing. I'm pretty sure their feelings wouldn't be that different.
In the meantime, if you are looking for ways to stay in the mix with the ladies, check out my blog:
Ultimate Sex Guide for Men
Pass by and share your thoughts!